Brown et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.

Filing 114

ORDER REGARDING PENDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES - DENIED AS MOOT by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler: Denying 105 Motion for Attorney Fees. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

Northern District of California

10

San Francisco Division

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

ROSMINAH BROWN and ERIC LOHELA,
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,

13

No. C 11-03082 LB
ORDER REGARDING PENDING
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

Plaintiffs,
v.

14

[ECF No. 102]

15

THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC., a
Delaware Corporation,

16

Defendant.
____________________________________

17
18

Plaintiffs have a pending motion for attorney’s fees. See ECF No. 102. The parties stipulated to

19

continuing briefing deadlines and also have said that they have reached a settlement agreement in

20

principle. See ECF No. 112. For docket management purposes, the court denies the pending motion

21

as moot. If the case does not settle, Plaintiffs may resuscitate the motion by filing a one-page

22

motion that incorporates the prior motion by reference.

23

This disposes of ECF No. 102.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: April 8, 2013

26
27
28

ORDER (C 11-03082 LB)

_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge