Weingand v. Harland Financial Solutions, Inc.
Filing
25
ORDER re 24 Telephonic appearance. Notice (Other) filed by Harland Financial Solutions, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/14/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
MICHAEL WEINGAND, an individual,
4
5
6
7
8
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:11-cv-03109-EMC
v.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
HARLAND FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS,
INC.’S REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE
HARLAND FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS,
INC., and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
Date:
Time:
Crtm.:
Judge:
9
March 16, 2012
10:30 a.m.
5
Hon. Edward M. Chen
Complaint Filed: May 24, 2011
10
11
Defendant, Harland Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Harland”) filed a request for its counsel,
12
George A. Stohner, to appear by telephone at the Case Management Conference set for March 16,
13
2012 at 10:30 a.m. before Judge Edward M. Chen.
14
This Court, having reviewed the Request, hereby finds and rules as follows:
15
THE COURT FINDS that good cause exists for the request of Harland’s counsel,
16
17
George A. Stohner, to make a telephonic appearance at the Case Management Conference.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant, Harland Financial
18
Solutions, Inc.’s Request for Telephonic Appearance is granted. Mr. Stohner shall call the Court
19
at the following number: __________________________.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
28
S
ER
R NIA
FO
dwar
Judge E
H
27
RT
26
en
d M. Ch
NO
25
Hon.
DERED Edward M. Chen
SO OR EUnited States District Judge
IT IS
IFI D
S MOD
A
LI
24
UNIT
ED
23
3/14/12
Dated: __________________
RT
U
O
22
A
20
The Court will call Mr. Stohner
between 10:30 and 12:00 p.m.
Mr. Stohner shall contact the
court if a different number to be
S DISTRICT
TE
C called other than 213-612-2500.
TA
________________________________
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03109-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?