Yuncker v. Pandora Media, Inc.

Filing 51

ORDER GRANTING (22 in 3:11-md-02264-JSW) Stipulation RE: MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/16/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011)

Case3:11-md-02264-JSW Document22

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Filed12/15/11 Page1 of 6

William M. Audet (CA State Bar #117456)
[e-mail]
Jonas P. Mann (CA State Bar #263314)
[e-mail]
Mariana S. Cole (CA State Bar #269939)
[e-mail]
Audet & Partners, LLP
221 Main Street, Suite 1460
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Scott A. Kamber
[e-mail]
David A. Stampley
[e-mail]
KamberLaw, LLC
100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor
New York, New York 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12
13

Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Class
(Additional Counsel listed on Signature Pages)

14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19

In re Google Inc., Android Consumer Privacy
Litigation

CASE No. 11 2264 JSW
MDL No. 2264

20
21

This Document Relates to

22

ALL CASES

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF
DEADLINES

23

TROY YUNCKER, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,

Case No. 11 3113 JSW

24

Plaintiff,

25
26
27
28

v.
PANDORA MEDIA, INC.,
Defendant.

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES

Case3:11-md-02264-JSW Document22

1
2
3
4
5

Filed12/15/11 Page2 of 6

The parties in the above-entitled actions, by and through their respective attorneys,
hereby stipulate to the following:
WHEREAS, Google’s response to the Amended Consolidated Complaint is currently due
on January 27, 2012;
WHEREAS, the plaintiffs in In re Google Inc. Android Consumer Privacy Litigation, 11

6

CV 2264 (JSW), believe that the filing of an amended complaint in place of the Amended

7

Consolidated Complaint filed on November 28, 2011, would benefit the parties and the Court

8

(the “First Amended Consolidated Master Class Action Complaint” or “FACMCAC”);

9

WHEREAS, plaintiffs’ and Google’s counsel have had multiple meet and confers about

10

plaintiffs’ Amended Consolidated Complaint filed on November 28, 2011, and Google agrees

11

that the parties and the Court would benefit from the filing of an amended, clarified FACMCAC,

12

in accordance with the terms of this Stipulation and Proposed Order;

13

WHEREAS the parties to this action and the parties to the related action of Yuncker v

14

Pandora Media, 2011 CV 03113 (JSW), believe that these actions and the Court would benefit

15

from continuing to have the Yuncker action proceed in tandem with In re Google Inc. Android

16

Consumer Privacy Litigation, 11 CV 2264 (JSW); and

17

WHEREAS, the Parties have therefore agreed that plaintiffs in In re Google Inc. Android

18

Consumer Privacy Litigation should be permitted to file a FACMCAC in accordance with the

19

following:

20

1. All prior deadlines in these actions are hereby vacated;

21

2. The FACMCAC shall be filed and served on or before January 23, 2012;

22

3. Google’s response to the FACMCAC, including any Motion to Dismiss, shall be filed

23
24
25
26
27
28

and served on or before March 23, 2012;
4. If Google chooses to file a Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Google’s
Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before April 20, 2012;
5. Google’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Google’s Motion to Dismiss shall be filed
and served on or before May 20, 2012;
6. No further amendment shall be permitted without leave of Court;
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES

Case3:11-md-02264-JSW Document22

1

Filed12/15/11 Page3 of 6

7. All deadlines in related action Yuncker v Pandora Media, 2011 CV 03113 (JSW), are

2

also vacated, with new dates to be entered that track those set forth above so that the

3

two actions can continue to progress in tandem.

4
5

IT IS SO AGREED:

6

DATE: December 15, 2011

11

Michael H. Rubin
Michael H. Rubin
David H. Kramer
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]

12

Attorney for Defendant Google Inc.

7
8
9
10

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

DATE: December 15, 2011

William M. Audet
William M. Audet
Jonas P. Mann
Mariana S. Cole
AUDET & PARTNERS LLP
221 Main Street
Suite 1460
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]

26

Scott A. Kamber
David A. Stampley
KAMBERLAW, LLC
100 Wall Street
23rd Floor
New York, NY 10005-3704
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]

27

Interim Class Counsel

21
22
23
24
25

28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES

Case3:11-md-02264-JSW Document22

1
2

DATE: December 15, 2011

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

14

16
17
18
19
20
21

Betsy Manifold
Betsy Carol Manifold
Francis M Gregorek
Patrick Hugh Moran
Rachel R. Rickert
WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN
& HERZ
Symphony Towers
750 B Street
Suite 2770
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Troy Yuncker in
Case No. 11 CV 3113 JSW

13

15

Filed12/15/11 Page4 of 6

DATE: December 15, 2011

Tyler G. Newby
Tyler Griffin Newby
Laurence F. Pulgram
Sebastian Elan Kaplan
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street
Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]

22
23

Attorneys for Pandora Media, Inc. in
Case No. 11 CV 3113 JSW

24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES

Case3:11-md-02264-JSW Document22

1
2

Filed12/15/11 Page5 of 6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO
ORDERED.

3
4

16th
SIGNED this ____ day of ______________, 2011.
December

5
6
7

__________________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES