Yuncker v. Pandora Media, Inc.

Filing 58

ORDER GRANTING (31 in 3:11-md-02264-JSW)and (57 in 3:11-cv-03113-JSW) STIPULATION Re: Modification Of Deadlines. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/16/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2012)

Download PDF
___________________________________ _________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Case3:11-cv-03113-JSW Document57 Filed04/13/12 Page1 of 8 1 2 3 6 8 9 FRANCIS M. GREGOREK (144785) gregorek@whath.com BETSY C. MANIFOLD (182450) manifold@whafh.com RACHELE R. RICKERT (190634) rickert@whath.com PATRICK H. MORAN (270881) moran@whafh.com WOLF HALDENSTETN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP 750 B Street, Suite 2770 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: 619/239-4599 Facsimile: 619/234-4599 13 JOSEPH J. SIPRUT (Pro Hac Vice) jsiprut@siprut.com SIPRUTPC 122 South Michigan Ave. Suite 1850 Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: 312/588-1440 Facsimile: 312/427-1850 14 Counsel for Plaintiff Troy Yuncker 10 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 16 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 TROY YIJNCKER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 20 21 Case No. 11 -cv-3 113 (JSW) ) Plaintiff v. PANDORA MEDIA, INC., 22 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSEDJ ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES Defendant ) 23 24 ) ) ) Case No. 1 1-cv-2264 (JSW) IN RE: GOOGLE INC., ANDROID CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION 25 26 This Document Relates to 27 ALL CASES 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MDL No. 2264 STIPULATiON AND [PROPOSED ORDER) Case No. 3:1 1-CV-2157-JSW; MDL NO. 2264 - Case3:11-cv-03113-JSW Document57 Filed04/13/12 Page2 of 8 1 2 The parties in the above-entitled actions, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate the following: 3 WHEREAS, Pandora’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Complaint in 4 Yuncker v. Pandora Media, Inc.[(”Pandora”)], No. 11-cv-3 113 (JSW) was filed on March 23, 5 2012; 6 7 WHEREAS, the opposition of plaintiff Troy Yuncker to Pandora’s Motion to Dismiss is due on or before April 20, 2012; 8 WHEREAS, one of the counsel for plaintiff Troy Yuncker, who has the lead responsibility 9 in briefing the opposition, has a family emergency and requests an additional two weeks to file an 10 opposition; 11 WHEREAS, Defendant Pandora does not oppose this request; 12 WHEREAS, the parties to the Yuncker action and the parties to the related action of In re 13 Google Inc. Android Consumer Privacy Litigation, No. 11 -cv-2264 (JSW) have met and conferred 14 and believe that these actions and the Court would benefit from continuing to have the Yuncker 15 and Google actions proceed in tandem; 16 WHEREAS, the Parties have therefore agreed that plaintiff Troy Yuncker in the Yuncker 17 action should be permitted to extend the time to file an opposition in accordance with the 18 following: 19 1. All prior deadlines in these actions are hereby vacated; 20 2. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Pandora’s Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before 21 22 23 24 May9,2012; 3. Pandora’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Pandora’s Motion to Dismiss shall be filed and served on or before June 22, 2012; 4. No further amendment shall be permitted without leave of Court; 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDERI - Case No. 3:1 1-CV-2157-JSW; MDL NO.22 —1— Case3:11-cv-03113-JSW Document57 Filed04/13/12 Page3 of 8 1 2 5. All deadlines in the related action In re Google The. Android Consumer Privaci Litigation, No. 11 -cv-2264 (JSW), are also vacated, with new dates to be entered that track those set forth above so that the two actions can continue to progress in tandem. 4 IT IS SO AGREED: 6 DATED: April 13, 2012 /s/Betsy C. Manifold BetsyC. Manifold Francis M. Gregorek Patrick H. Moran Rachele R. Rickert WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZLLP Symphony Towers 750 B Street, Suite 2770 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619)239-4599 Facsimile: (619) 234-4599 Email: manifold@whafh.com Email: gregorek@whafh.com Email: moran@whath.com Email: rickert@whafh.com 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Troy Yuncker in Case No. 11-cv-3113 (JSW) 17 DATED: April 13, 2012 24 /s/Tyler G. Newby Tyler Griffin Newby Laurence F. Puigram Sebastian Elan Kaplan FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415)281-1350 Email: tnewby@fenwick.com Email: lpulgramfenwick.com Email: skaplan@fenwick.com 25 Attorneysfor Pandora Media, Inc. in 26 Case No. 11-cv-31l3 (JSW) 18 19 20 21 22 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDERJ Case No. 3:11 -CV-2 1 57-JSW; MDL NO. 2264 - Case3:11-cv-03113-JSW Document57 Filed04/13/12 Page4 of 8 1 DATED: April 13, 2012 /s/Michael H. Rubin Michael H. Rubin David H. Kramer WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650)493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Email: dkramerwsgr.com Email: mrubinwsgr.com 2 3 4 5 6 Attorneyfor Defendant Google Inc. in Case No. 1 1-cv-2264 (JSW) 7 8 DATED: April 13, 2012 /s/William M. Audet William M. Audet Jonas P. Mann Mariana S. Cole AUDET & PARTNERS LLP 221 Main Street, Suite 1460 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 982-1776 Facsimile: (415) 568-2556 Email: waudet@audetlaw.com Email: jmannaudetlaw.com Email: mcole@audetlaw.com 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Scott A. Kamber David A. Stampley KAMBERLAW, LLC 100 Wall Street. 23rd Floor New York, NY ‘10005-3704 Telephone: (212)920-3072 Facsimile: (212)290-3081 Email: skamber@kamberlaw.com Email: dstampley@kamberlaw.com 17 18 19 20 21 22 Interim Class Counsel in Case No. 1 1-cv-2264 (JSW) 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDERI Case No. 3:1 I-CV-2157-JSW; MDL NO. 2264 - -3- Case3:11-cv-03113-JSW Document57 Filed04/13/12 Page5 of 8 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 16 day of April — , 2012. 4 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1, I., 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] Case No. 3:1 1-CV-2157-JSW; MDL NO. 2264 - 4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?