Symantec Corporation v. Johns Creek Software, Inc. et al

Filing 44

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED EXTENSION OF RESPONSE DEADLINE re 43 Stipulation filed by Symantec Corporation. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 12, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Perry J. Viscounty (Bar No. 132143)
[e-mail]
650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor
Costa Mesa, California 92626-1925
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Jennifer L. Barry (Bar No. 228066)
[e-mail]
600 West Broadway, Suite 1800
San Diego, California 92101-3375
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYMANTEC CORPORATION

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a
Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,

16

19

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
EXTENDING DATE TO RESPOND TO
COUNTER-COMPLAINT

v.

17
18

CASE NO. 11-cv-03146-WHA

JOHNS CREEK SOFTWARE, INC., a
Georgia Corporation, STEPHEN
CHEATHAM, an individual, and DOES 110,

20

Defendants.

21
22
23

Plaintiff Symantec Corporation (“Plaintiff”) and defendants Johns Creek Software, Inc.
and Stephen Cheatham (“Defendants”) stipulate as follows:

24

1.

Plaintiff filed its Complaint on June 24, 2011.

25

2.

After the Court denied their Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

26

on September 12, 2011, Defendants filed an Answer and Counter-Complaint on September 22,

27

2011.

28

3.
SD\806574.1

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN DIEGO

Symantec’s response to the Counter-Complaint is currently due on October 17,
Case No. 11-cv-03146-WHA
Stipulation and Proposed Order
Extending Date to Respond to Counter-Complaint

1
2
3
4

2011.
4.

Based on meet-and-confer discussions between the parties, Defendants intend to

amend their Counter-Complaint on or before October 24, 2011.
5.

The parties accordingly stipulate and request that Plaintiff’s time to respond to the

5

Counter-Complaint be extended to 24 days after the filing and service of Defendants’ Amended

6

Counter-Complaint.

7
8

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: October 12, 2011

9

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
By:

/s/ Jennifer L. Barry
Jennifer L. Barry

10

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYMANTEC CORPORATION

11
12

Dated: October 12, 2011

13

RODENBAUGH LAW
By:

/s/ Michael L. Rodenbaugh
Michael L. Rodenbaugh

14

Attorneys for Defendants
JOHNS CREEK SOFTWARE, INC.
AND STEPHEN CHEATHAM

15
16
17
ORDER

18
19

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

October 12, 2011.
Date: _______________________

22

____________________________________
JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP
U.S. District Court Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

ATTESTATION: I certify that I obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from all
parties whose electronic signatures appear above.
Dated: October 12, 2011
/s/ Jennifer L. Barry
SD\806574.1

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN DIEGO

Case No. 11-cv-03146-WHA
Stipulation and Proposed Order
Extending Date to Respond to Counter-Complaint