Santiago v. Equable Ascent Financial et al

Filing 66

ORDER granting 65 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 60 MOTION for Attorney Fees Date for Hearing filed by Equable Ascent Financial, et al. Reset Hearing as to 60 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Motion Hearing reset for 6/14/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/10/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)

Case3:11-cv-03158-CRB Document65 Filed04/05/13 Page1 of 2

O. Randolph Bragg
HORWITZ, HORWITZ & ASSOCIATES
2 25 East Washington Street, Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60602
3 [phone]
[phone]
4 [e-mail]
1

5

Attorney for Plaintiff Abdon Santiago

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

San Francisco Division

10

ABDON SANTIAGO,
on behalf of himself and
12 all others similarly situated,
11

13

CASE NO.: 11–cv-003158

Plaintiff,

14
15

v.

16
17

Date: May 10, 2013
Time: 10:00 AM
Location: U.S. District Court
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA
Courtroom 6, 17th Floor

EQUABLE ASCENT FINANCIAL
and AHN H. REGENT,

18
19
20
21

Defendants.
_________________________________________/

22

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

23

REGARDING HEARING DATE ON

24

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

25
26
27

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 of the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California the above parties stipulate as follows:

28
1

Case3:11-cv-03158-CRB Document65 Filed04/05/13 Page2 of 2

1

1.

At Plaintiff’s request, the Court recently extended the date for the

2

filing of the Reply Brief regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for an Award of Costs and

3

Attorneys Fees, and set the hearing date on the motion for May 10, 2013,

4

2.

Counsel for Defendants has a conflict on that date, as he is scheduled

5

to be out of town attending a conference for a national trade group where he will be

6

chairing a committee meeting. In addition, counsel for Plaintiff, Irving Berg, is

7

undergoing surgery and will need additional time to recover.

8
9

3.

All counsel are presently free for a hearing on June 14, 2013, and the

a parties respectfully request that the Court re-set the hearing for that date.

10
11

15

s/ O. Randolph Bragg
O. Randolph Bragg
HORWITZ, HORWITZ & ASSOC.
25 E Washington St Ste 900
Chicago IL 60602
[phone]
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

16

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

12
13
14

17

20

_s/Tomio B. Narita
Tomio B. Narita
SIMMONDS & NARITA, LLP
44 Montgomery St., Ste 3010
San Francisco, CA 94104-4816

21

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS

18
19

22
23
24

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the new
hearing date on the motion shall be _____________________.
June 14, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.

25

RT

H

ER

FO

reyer
les R. B
ge Char
Jud

NO

2

LI

28

A

Signed: April 10, 2013

R NIA

__________________
D
CHARLES R. BREYER
RDERE
IS SO O JUDGE
IT
U.S. DISTRICT
UNIT
ED

27

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

26

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C