Loskot v. Valucci Restaurants, Inc. et al

Filing 8

ORDER re 7 Stipulation filed by Marshall Loskot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/28/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP BENJAMIN M. GLICKMAN, SBN 247907 BGlickman@gibsondunn.com 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-5300 Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 Attorneys for Defendant McDONALD’S CORPORATION KAUFMAN DOLOWICH VOLUCK & GONZO LLP KATHERINE S. CATLOS, ESQ. SBN 184227 AARON M. SCOLARI, ESQ. SBN 237397 425 California Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 402-0059 Facsimile: (415) 402-0679 Attorneys for Defendants VALUCCI RESTAURANTS, INC., dba McDONALD'S SINGLETON LAW GROUP JASON K. SINGLETON, SBN 166170 jason@singletonlawgroup.com 611 “L” Street, Suite A Eureka, California 95501 Telephone: (707) 441-1177 Facsimile: (707) 441-1533 Attorney for Plaintiff MARSHALL LOSKOT 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 MARSHALL LOSKOT, 22 23 24 25 26 27 CASE NO. 3:11-cv-3174-JSC Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE G.O. 56 SITE INSPECTION v. VALUCCI RESTAURANTS, INC., a California Corporation, dba McDONALD’S, MARY D. COGBURN, TRUSTEE of THE MARY D. COGBURN TRUST, and DOES ONE to FIFTY, inclusive, ACTION FILED: TRIAL DATE: June 27, 2011 NONE Defendants. 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE G.O. 56 SITE INSPECTION CASE NO. 3:11-cv-3174-JSC 1 Plaintiff MARSHALL LOSKOT and defendants VALUCCI RESTAURANTS, INC. dba 2 McDONALD’S and McDONALD’S CORPORATION hereby jointly stipulate and request through 3 their attorneys of record that the Court continue the deadline to complete the General Order 56 site 4 inspection from October 5, 2011 to October 26, 2011. 5 Good cause exists for the requested continuance: 6 WHEREAS, Defendant McDONALD’S CORPORATION was recently substituted for 7 defendant MARY D. COGBURN and has not yet filed an answer to the Complaint; 8 WHEREAS, the Parties are in the process of discussing a settlement of the lawsuit; 9 WHEREAS, continuing the site inspection will permit the Parties to focus their efforts and 10 attention on reaching a negotiated resolution of the lawsuit, without incurring the significant costs 11 associated with a site inspection; 12 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED, by and between the 13 Parties, through their respective attorneys of record, and based on the foregoing, that the deadline to 14 complete the joint site inspection, as required by General Order No. 56, be continued from October 5, 15 2011 to October 26, 2011. 16 17 DATED: September 20, 2011 SINGLETON LAW GROUP 18 19 By: /s/ Jason K. Singleton 20 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARSHALL LOSKOT 21 22 23 24 DATED: September 20, 2011 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 25 26 By: /s/ Benjamin M. Glickman 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Attorneys for Defendant McDONALD’S CORPORATION 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE G.O. 56 SITE INSPECTION CASE NO. 3:11-cv-3174-JSC 1 DATED: September 20, 2011 KAUFMAN DOLOWICH VOLUCK & GONZO LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Aaron M. Scolari 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant VALUCCI RESTAURANTS, INC. dba McDONALD’S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE G.O. 56 SITE INSPECTION CASE NO. 3:11-cv-3174-JSC ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to Stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the deadline 3 to complete the joint site inspection, as required by General Order No. 56, shall be extended from 4 October 5, 2011 to October 26, 2011. 5 6 DATE: September 28, 2011 7 HON. JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE G.O. 56 SITE INSPECTION CASE NO. 3:11-cv-3174-JSC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?