Guindani v. Couder et al

Filing 74

ORDER Re Supplemental Briefing Re Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/27/2014. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 IN RE OCLARO, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. Lead Case No. C-11-3176 EMC ___________________________________/ ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval. Having reviewed the 15 motion, the Court hereby orders the parties to provide a joint supplemental brief regarding the 16 following issues. The joint supplemental briefing shall be filed no later than April 10, 2014. 17 1. 18 Corporate Governance Reform Under the settlement agreement, the corporate governance reform measures are limited to 19 two years. See Stip. of Sett. § 2.1. The parties shall address whether time limitations are common in 20 settlements of derivative lawsuits and whether a two-year period is adequate. 21 2. 22 Attorney’s Fees Plaintiff intends to ask for attorney’s fees in the amount of $250,000. The Court 23 acknowledges that no fee motion need be filed at this point in the proceedings; however, the Court 24 should have a sense of whether this figure is related to the lodestar. Plaintiff shall address this issue 25 in the supplemental briefing. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 3. Notice 2 The parties have pointed to several cases where notice comparable to that proposed herein 3 has been acceptable. The parties should address whether such notice, absent mail notice, satisfies 4 Rule 23.1(b). 5 6 In addition, the parties should explain why notice on Oclaro’s website should be posted on only the “investor relations section of the Company’s website.” Stip. of Sett. § 3.2. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: March 27, 2014 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?