Martinez et al v. Aero Caribbean et al

Filing 78

ORDER RE POTENTIAL MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/31/2014. (whalc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2014).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 LORENZO MENDOZA MARTINEZ, ELIU MENDOZA, ELIEZER MENDOZA MARTINEZ, and GLORIA MARTINEZ MONTES, 12 13 No. C 11-03194 WHA Plaintiffs, v. 15 AERO CARIBBEAN, EMPRESA AEROCARIBBEAN S.A., CUBANA DE AVIACION S.A., and GIE AVIONS DE TRANSPORT REGIONAL, 16 ORDER RE POTENTIAL MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT Defendants. 14 / 17 18 Following the order dated February 11 (Dkt. No. 76), plaintiffs submit proof of delivery 19 of the summons and complaint via DHL delivery to the Cuban defendants, with “proof of 20 delivery” documents included (Dkt. No. 77). In that submission, plaintiffs ask that their earlier 21 motion for entry of default and default judgment “now be granted or, in the alternative, 22 [p]laintiffs be permitted to re-file the motion,” if the Cuban defendants do not appear in this 23 action within 21 days after service. Of note, plaintiffs’ earlier motion was already denied by an 24 order dated January 28 (Dkt. No. 74). 25 Accordingly, the earlier motion will not be reopened. Plaintiffs, however, may move for 26 entry of default from the Clerk, before filing with the undersigned judge any fresh motion for 27 entry of default and/or default judgment, noticed on the regular 35-day track. 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?