Martinez et al v. Aero Caribbean et al
Filing
78
ORDER RE POTENTIAL MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/31/2014. (whalc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2014).
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
LORENZO MENDOZA MARTINEZ,
ELIU MENDOZA, ELIEZER MENDOZA
MARTINEZ, and GLORIA MARTINEZ
MONTES,
12
13
No. C 11-03194 WHA
Plaintiffs,
v.
15
AERO CARIBBEAN, EMPRESA
AEROCARIBBEAN S.A., CUBANA DE
AVIACION S.A., and GIE AVIONS DE
TRANSPORT REGIONAL,
16
ORDER RE POTENTIAL
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF
DEFAULT AND DEFAULT
JUDGMENT
Defendants.
14
/
17
18
Following the order dated February 11 (Dkt. No. 76), plaintiffs submit proof of delivery
19
of the summons and complaint via DHL delivery to the Cuban defendants, with “proof of
20
delivery” documents included (Dkt. No. 77). In that submission, plaintiffs ask that their earlier
21
motion for entry of default and default judgment “now be granted or, in the alternative,
22
[p]laintiffs be permitted to re-file the motion,” if the Cuban defendants do not appear in this
23
action within 21 days after service. Of note, plaintiffs’ earlier motion was already denied by an
24
order dated January 28 (Dkt. No. 74).
25
Accordingly, the earlier motion will not be reopened. Plaintiffs, however, may move for
26
entry of default from the Clerk, before filing with the undersigned judge any fresh motion for
27
entry of default and/or default judgment, noticed on the regular 35-day track.
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 31, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?