Martinez et al v. Aero Caribbean et al

Filing 83

RULE 54(b) CERTIFICATE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/2/2014. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 LORENZO MENDOZA MARTINEZ, ELIU MENDOZA, ELIEZER MENDOZA MARTINEZ, and GLORIA MARTINEZ MONTES, No. C 11-03194 WHA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. RULE 54(b) CERTIFICATE 12 14 AERO CARIBBEAN, EMPRESA AEROCARIBBEAN S.A., CUBANA DE AVIACION S.A., and AVIONS DE TRANSPORT REGIONAL, 15 Defendants. 13 / 16 On April 20, 2012, an order dismissed defendant Avions de Transport Regional for lack 17 18 of personal jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 48). Judgment was entered in favor of ATR and against 19 plaintiffs, but with the express statement that judgment was not entered as to the remaining 20 defendants — Aero Carribean, Empressa Aerocarribean S.A., and Cubana de Aviacion S.A. 21 Plaintiffs then filed a notice of appeal on the dismissal order only. 22 Our court of appeals has since ordered a limited remand to determine whether the 23 dismissal order should be certified as an appealable, final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil 24 Procedure 54(b). Because ATR has been dismissed from this action as a defendant, and 25 because there is no just reason for delay, this order certifies the dismissal order pursuant to Rule 26 54(b). 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 2, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?