Martinez et al v. Aero Caribbean et al
Filing
83
RULE 54(b) CERTIFICATE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/2/2014. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014).
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
LORENZO MENDOZA MARTINEZ,
ELIU MENDOZA, ELIEZER MENDOZA
MARTINEZ, and GLORIA MARTINEZ
MONTES,
No. C 11-03194 WHA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Plaintiffs,
11
v.
RULE 54(b) CERTIFICATE
12
14
AERO CARIBBEAN, EMPRESA
AEROCARIBBEAN S.A., CUBANA DE
AVIACION S.A., and AVIONS DE
TRANSPORT REGIONAL,
15
Defendants.
13
/
16
On April 20, 2012, an order dismissed defendant Avions de Transport Regional for lack
17
18
of personal jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 48). Judgment was entered in favor of ATR and against
19
plaintiffs, but with the express statement that judgment was not entered as to the remaining
20
defendants — Aero Carribean, Empressa Aerocarribean S.A., and Cubana de Aviacion S.A.
21
Plaintiffs then filed a notice of appeal on the dismissal order only.
22
Our court of appeals has since ordered a limited remand to determine whether the
23
dismissal order should be certified as an appealable, final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil
24
Procedure 54(b). Because ATR has been dismissed from this action as a defendant, and
25
because there is no just reason for delay, this order certifies the dismissal order pursuant to Rule
26
54(b).
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 2, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?