Brambila et al v. Reo Bay Area, LP et al

Filing 34

ORDER DISMISSING CASE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
United States District Court Court
United States District
For the Northern District ofDistrict of California
For the Northern California

10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

11
12
13

No. C 11-03202 SI

PEDRO A. BRAMBILA, and
DOMINGA BRAMBILA,
Plaintiff,
v.

15

REO BAY AREA, LP, JACKIE
WARDELL, COURT CLERK, CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,
KIMBALL, TIREY & ST. JOHN, LLP,
BANK OF AMERICA, NA.

16

Defendant.

14

/

17
18
19

On June 28, 2011, plaintiffs filed this suit in connection with the foreclosure of their home

20

located at 410 Madera Street, Brentwood, California. On July 14, 2011, defendants REO Bay Area, LP

21

and Kimball, Tirey & St. John LLP filed a motion to dismiss. The Court granted defendants’ motion

22

to dismiss but granted plaintiffs leave to amend. Doc. 17 at 8.

23

On September 29, 2011, plaintiffs amended their complaint and included two new defendants:

24

Jackie Worden and Bank of America, N.A. Worden and Bank of America moved to dismiss this case

25

on October 24, 2011 and October 28, 2011, respectively. Because plaintiffs did not file any oppositions,

26

on November 16, 2011, the Court ordered plaintiffs to show cause in writing to be filed no later than

27

November 26, 2011 why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

28

1
2

The plaintiffs did not file a response to the Court’s order to show cause, nor did they contact the
Court in any other manner. This case is therefore dismissed, without prejudice.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: January 17, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge

7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2