Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc et al

Filing 101

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 100 re 11 Amended Complaint, filed by Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust, Global Client Solutions, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/10/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

RICHARD W. EPSTEIN (FLA. BAR NO: 229091)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission)
[e-mail]
REBECCA F. BRATTER (FLA. BAR NO: 0685100)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission)
[e-mail]
GREENSPOON MARDER, P.A.
200 East Broward Blvd., Suite 1500
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
954-491-1120
954-343-6958(facsimile)
ROBERT S. BOULTER (SBN 153549)
[e-mail]
PETER C. LAGARIAS (SBN 77091)
[e-mail]
LAGARIAS & BOULTER, LLP
1629 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, California 94901-1828
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
Global Client Solutions, LLC and
Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
HEATHER NEWTON, individually and)
behalf of others similarly situated,

) Case No: 3:11-CV-03228-EMC
)
PLAINTIFF,
) CLASS ACTION
)
v.
) PROPOSED ORDER ON GLOBAL
) CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, ROCKY
AMERICAN DEBT SERVICES, INC., a
) MOUNTAIN BANK AND TRUST, AND
California corporation; QUALITY SUPPORT )
SERVICES, LLC, a California limited liability ) PLAINTIFF’S STIPULATION RE:
company; GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, ) DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO FIRST
LLC; ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND
) AMENDED COMPLAINT [D.E. 11].
TRUST; and DOES 1-100,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

25
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

1

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Plaintiff Heather Newton (“Plaintiff”)

2

and Defendants Rocky Mountain Bank & Trust and Global Client Solutions, LLC (collectively,

3

“Defendants”) (all, “Parties”) Stipulation pertaining to Defendants’ deadline to file their

4

respective Answers to Plaintiff’s First Amended Class Action Complaint [D.E. 11], it is now

5

thereupon,

6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

7

1. The Parties’ Stipulation is GRANTED.

8

2. Defendants’ respective Answers to Plaintiff’s First Amended Class Action Complaint

12

S

dwa
Judge E

ER

H

18

hen

rd M. C

RT

17

O
IT IS S

NO

16

__________________________________________
ED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
ORDER

R NIA

15

UNIT
ED

14

RT
U
O

13

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

19

FO

11

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at San Francisco, California, on this
10th
_________day of August, 2012.

LI

10

shall be filed on or before September 5, 2012.

A

9

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

C