Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc et al

Filing 148

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 147 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Requesting Order Extending Time to File Declarations filed by Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust, Global Client Solutions, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/26/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

RICHARD W. EPSTEIN (FLA. BAR NO: 229091)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission)
[e-mail]
REBECCA F. BRATTER (FLA. BAR NO: 0685100)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission)
[e-mail]
MEREDITH H. LEONARD (FLA. BAR NO: 69535)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission)

[e-mail]

9

GREENSPOON MARDER, P.A.
Trade Centre South, Suite 700
100 W. Cypress Creek Road, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
954-491-1120 (phone)
954-343-6958(facsimile)

10

ROBERT S. BOULTER (SBN 153549)

6
7
8

[e-mail]
1101 Fifth Avenue, Suite 310
San Rafael, CA 94901
12
Tel: [phone]
13 Fax: [phone]
11

14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants
Global Client Solutions, LLC and
Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

HEATHER NEWTON, individually and)
behalf of others similarly situated,

) Case No: 3:11-CV-03228-EMC
)
Plaintiff,
) CLASS ACTION
)
v.
) PROPOSED ORDER ON DEFENDANTS
) GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC,
AMERICAN DEBT SERVICES, INC., a
) ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK & TRUST,
California corporation; QUALITY SUPPORT ) AND PLAINTIFF HEATHER NEWTON’S
SERVICES, LLC, a California limited liability ) STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
company; GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, ) EXTENDING TIME TO FILE
LLC; ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND
) DECLARATIONS
TRUST; and DOES 1-100,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

28
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

1

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Plaintiff Heather Newton (“Plaintiff”)

2

and Defendants Rocky Mountain Bank & Trust and Global Client Solutions, LLC (collectively,

3

“Defendants”) (all, “Parties”) Stipulated Request for an Order extending the time by which

4

RMBT and Global must file and serve their respective declarations establishing that documents

5

designated as confidential are sealable under Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), it is now thereupon,

6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

7

1. The Parties’ Stipulation is GRANTED.

8

2. Defendants’ deadline to file their respective declarations establishing that documents

9

designated as confidential are sealable is extended up through and including April 30,

15
16

RT

18

__________________________________________
ERED
O ORD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
IT IS S
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg

NO

17

UNIT
ED

14

RT
U
O

S

13

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

ER

20

A

H

19

R NIA

12

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at San Francisco, California, on this
26th
_________day of April, 2013.

FO

11

2013.

LI

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION