Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc et al

Filing 162

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 158 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For One-Day Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Class Certification [DE135] filed by Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust, Global Client Solutions, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/17/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

RICHARD W. EPSTEIN (FLA. BAR NO: 229091)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission)
[e-mail]
REBECCA F. BRATTER (FLA. BAR NO: 0685100)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission)
[e-mail]
MEREDITH H. LEONARD (FLA. BAR NO: 69535)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission)

[e-mail]

9

GREENSPOON MARDER, P.A.
Trade Centre South, Suite 700
100 W. Cypress Creek Road, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
954-491-1120 (phone)
954-343-6958(facsimile)

10

ROBERT S. BOULTER (SBN 153549)

6
7
8

[e-mail]
1101 Fifth Avenue, Suite 310
San Rafael, CA 94901
12
Tel: [phone]
13 Fax: [phone]
11

14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants
Global Client Solutions, LLC and
Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

HEATHER NEWTON, individually and)
behalf of others similarly situated,

) Case No: 3:11-CV-03228-EMC
)
Plaintiff,
) CLASS ACTION
)
v.
) PROPOSED ORDER DEFENDANTS
) GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC,
AMERICAN DEBT SERVICES, INC., a
) ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK & TRUST
California corporation; QUALITY SUPPORT ) AND PLAINTIFF HEATHER
SERVICES, LLC, a California limited liability ) NEWTON’S AND STIPULATED
company; GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, ) REQUEST FOR A BRIEF ONE-DAY
LLC; ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND
) EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
TRUST; and DOES 1-100,
) DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE IN
) OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
Defendants.
) CLASS CERTICATION
)
)

28
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

1

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Plaintiff Heather Newton (“Plaintiff”)

2

and Defendants Rocky Mountain Bank & Trust and Global Client Solutions, LLC (collectively,

3

“Defendants”) (all, “Parties”) Stipulated Request for an Order extending the time, by one day, by

4

which RMBT and Global must file and serve their Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion

5

for Class Certification, it is now thereupon,

6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

7

1. The Parties’ Stipulation is GRANTED.

8

2. The deadline for RMBT and Global to file and serve their Response in Opposition to

9

Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification, is extended up through and including May

10

17
_________day of May, 2013.

13

16

S
13124080.1

UNIT
ED

15

__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT DEREDJUDGE
COURT

O OR

IT IS S

17
dwa
Judge E

20

A

H

ER

LI

RT

19

hen

rd M. C

NO

18

RT
U
O

14

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

12

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at San Francisco, California, on this

FO

11

17, 2013.

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

C