Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc et al
Filing
241
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 240 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES filed by Heather L Newton, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 240 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES. Responses due by 7/10/2014. Replies due by 7/24/2014. MSJ Motion Hearing set for 8/14/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Motion Hearing set for 11/13/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 8/7/2014. Case Management Conference set for 8/14/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/29/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2014)
1
2
3
4
Tavy A. Dumont, (CSB #244946)
LAW OFFICE OF TAVY A. DUMONT
101 Cooper St., Suite 223
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
phone: (831) 288-0714
fax: (831) 515-5013
Email: tavy.dumont@dumontlaw.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
William E. Kennedy (CSB #158214)
CONSUMER LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM E. KENNEDY
2797 Park Avenue, Suite 201
Santa Clara, California 95050
(408) 241-1000 phone
(408) 241-1500 fax
wkennedy@kennedyconsumerlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HEATHER L. NEWTON
and the Proposed Class
Other counsel listed on signature page
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
HEATHER L. NEWTON, individually and on
behalf of others similarly situated,
CLASS ACTION
18
Plaintiff,
19
v.
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case No.: 3:11-cv-03228 EMC
AMERICAN DEBT SERVICES, INC., et al,
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS GLOBAL CLIENT
SOLUTIONS, LLC AND ROCKY MOUNTAIN
BANK & TRUST AND PLAINTIFF HEATHER
NEWTON’S STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF DEADLINES PERTAINING
TO 1) DISCOVERY REQUESTS, 2)
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION, AND 3)
CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION, AND
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED REQUESTS RE: EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03228 EMC
1
THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Stipulated Request of Plaintiff Heather L.
2
Newton (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Rocky Mountain Bank & Trust (“RMBT”) and Global Client
3
Solutions, LLC (“Global”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for an extension of deadlines pertaining to 1)
4
production of discovery responses required by Judge Spero’s May 13, 2014 discovery order, 2)
5
6
7
8
summary judgment motion, and 3) class certification motion, and continuing the Case Management
Conference;
IT IS ORDERED:
9
10
Defendants’ deadline for service of documents and responses ordered by Judge Spero in May
11
13, 2014 order [Docket #237] is continued from May 27, 2014 to June 17, 2014
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Summary Judgment motion due on July 10, 2014
Defendant’s Reply on Summary Judgment motion due on July 24, 2014
Hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is continued from June 19, 2014 to
14
August 7, 2014, 1:30 p.m.
14
17
Case Management Conference is continued from July 10, 2014 to August 7, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.
18
Deadline for Plaintiff to file Motion for Class Certification is continued from June 6, 2014 to
19
September 25, 2014
20
Opposition to Motion for Class Certification due: October 16, 2014
21
Reply on Motion for Class Certification due: October 30, 2014
22
Hearing on Motion for Class Certification is continued from July 10, 2014 to November 13,
23
2014, 1:30 p.m.
24
25
SO ORDERED
26
27
28
Page 1
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED REQUESTS RE: EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03228 EMC
1
May, 2014.
4
S
8
RT
10
NO
9
RDER
IS SO O FIED
IT
DI
AS MO
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
J
ER
12
A
H
11
R NIA
7
_________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ED
UNIT
ED
6
RT
U
O
5
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
3
29th
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at San Francisco, California, on this _________day of
LI
2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED REQUESTS RE: EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03228 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?