Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc et al

Filing 82

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 81 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re 11 Amended Complaint, filed by Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust, Global Client Solutions, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/10/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2012)

Case3:11-cv-03228-EMC Document81-1 Filed03/28/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

RICHARD W. EPSTEIN (FLA. BAR NO: 229091)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending)
[e-mail]
REBECCA F. BRATTER (FLA. BAR NO: 0685100)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending)
[e-mail]
GREENSPOON MARDER, P.A.
Trade Centre South, Suite 700
100 W. Cypress Creek Road, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
954-491-1120
954-343-6958(facsimile)
ROBERT S. BOULTER (SBN 153549)
[e-mail]
PETER C. LAGARIAS (SBN 77091)
[e-mail]
LAGARIAS & BOULTER, LLP
1629 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, California 94901-1828
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12

Attorneys for Defendants
Global Client Solutions, LLC and
13 Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

HEATHER NEWTON, individually and)
behalf of others similarly situated,
) Case No: 3:11-CV-03228-EMC
)
PLAINTIFF,
) CLASS ACTION
)
v.
) PROPOSED ORDER ON GLOBAL
)
AMERICAN DEBT SERVICES, INC., a) CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC,
California corporation; QUALITY
) ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND
SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC, a
) TRUST, AND PLAINTIFF’S
California limited liability company;
)
GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC; ) STIPULATION RE: DEADLINE TO
ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND
) RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
TRUST; and DOES 1-100,
) COMPLAINT [D.E. 11].
)
Defendants.
)
)

27
28
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

Case3:11-cv-03228-EMC Document81-1 Filed03/28/12 Page2 of 2

1

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Plaintiff Heather Newton

2

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Rocky Mountain Bank & Trust and Global Client

3

Solutions, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) (all, “Parties”) Stipulation pertaining

4

to Defendants’ deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Class Action

5

Complaint [D.E. 11], it is now thereupon,

6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

7

1. The Parties’ Stipulation is GRANTED.

8

2. Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s First Amended Class Action

11

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at San Francisco, California, on this

April
10th
_________day of March, 2012.

S
14

UNIT
ED

13

RT
U
O

12

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

DERED
__________________________________________
SO OR
IT IS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

15

ER

LI

dwa
Judge E

19

A

H

18

RT

17

hen

rd M. C

NO

16

R NIA

10

Complaint shall be filed on or before April 19, 2012.

FO

9

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

C