Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc et al

Filing 84

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 83 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 11 Amended Complaint, filed by Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust, Global Client Solutions, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/20/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

RICHARD W. EPSTEIN (FLA. BAR NO: 229091)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending)
[e-mail]
REBECCA F. BRATTER (FLA. BAR NO: 0685100)
(Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending)
[e-mail]
GREENSPOON MARDER, P.A.
Trade Centre South, Suite 700
100 W. Cypress Creek Road, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
954-491-1120
954-343-6958(facsimile)
ROBERT S. BOULTER (SBN 153549)
[e-mail]
PETER C. LAGARIAS (SBN 77091)
[e-mail]
LAGARIAS & BOULTER, LLP
1629 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, California 94901-1828
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12

Attorneys for Defendants
Global Client Solutions, LLC and
13 Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
HEATHER NEWTON, individually and)
behalf of others similarly situated,
) Case No: 3:11-CV-03228-EMC
)
PLAINTIFF,
) CLASS ACTION
)
v.
) PROPOSED ORDER ON GLOBAL
)
AMERICAN DEBT SERVICES, INC., a) CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC,
California corporation; QUALITY
) ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND
SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC, a
) TRUST, AND PLAINTIFF’S
California limited liability company;
)
GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC; ) STIPULATION RE: DEADLINE TO
ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND
) RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
TRUST; and DOES 1-100,
) COMPLAINT [D.E. 11].
)
Defendants.
)
)

27
28
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

1

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Plaintiff Heather Newton

2

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Rocky Mountain Bank & Trust and Global Client

3

Solutions, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) (all, “Parties”) Stipulation pertaining

4

to Defendants’ deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Class Action

5

Complaint [D.E. 11], it is now thereupon,

6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

7

1. The Parties’ Stipulation is GRANTED.

8

2. Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s First Amended Class Action
Complaint shall be filed on or before May 17, 2012.

9
20th

_________day of April, 2012.

15

RT

17

dwar
Judge E

ER

19

A

H

18

en

d M. Ch

NO

16

D
__________________________________________
RDERE
IS SO O DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
IT
UNITED STATES
R NIA

14

UNIT
ED

13

RT
U
O

S

12

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

11

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at San Francisco, California, on this

LI

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

C