Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc et al

Filing 95

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY re 88 MOTION to Stay filed by Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust, Global Client Solutions, LLC, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 88 MOTION to Stay . Replies due by 6/7/2012.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

RICHARD W. EPSTEIN (FLA. BAR NO: 229091)
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
REBECCA F. BRATTER (FLA. BAR NO: 0685100)
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
GREENSPOON MARDER, P.A.
200 East Broward Blvd., Suite 1500
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
954-491-1120
954-343-6958(facsimile)
ROBERT S. BOULTER (SBN 153549)
[e-mail]
PETER C. LAGARIAS (SBN 77091)
[e-mail]
LAGARIAS & BOULTER, LLP
1629 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, California 94901-1828
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
Global Client Solutions, LLC and
Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

HEATHER NEWTON, individually and)
behalf of others similarly situated,

) Case No: 3:11-CV-03228-EMC
)
PLAINTIFF,
) CLASS ACTION
)
v.
) PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION
) DEFENDANT GLOBAL CLIENT
AMERICAN DEBT SERVICES, INC., a
) SOLUTIONS, LLC & ROCKEY
California corporation; QUALITY SUPPORT )
SERVICES, LLC, a California limited liability ) MOUNTAIN BANK & TRUST AND
company; GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, ) PLAINTIFF HEATHER NEWTON’S
LLC; ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND
) STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TRUST; and DOES 1-100,
) DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO FILE A
) REPLY ON THE MOTION TO STAY
)
Defendants.
)
)

27
28

PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

1

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Defendants Rocky Mountain Bank &

2

Trust (“RMBT”), Global Client Solutions, LLC (“Global”), (collectively, “Defendants”) and

3

Plaintiff Heather Newton (“Plaintiff”) (all, “Parties”) Stipulation to Extend Defendants’ deadline

4

to file their Reply to Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion to Stay (the

5

“Response”), it is now thereupon,

6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

7

1. The Parties’ Stipulation is GRANTED.

8

2. Global and RMBT’s reply(s) to Plaintiff’s Response shall be due on June 7, 2012.

UNIT
ED

12

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

11

__________________________________________
DERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
SO OR
IS
dward
Judge E

NO

15

IT

RT

16

ER

18

n

M. Che

H

17

R NIA

14

FO

13

LI

10

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at San Francisco, California, on this
6th
_________day of June, 2012.

A

9

N

D IS T IC T
R

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9432253 .14022.0116v1

2
PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

OF

C