Anthony Fredianelli v. Stephan Jenkins et al

Filing 175

ORDER to Show Cause. The Godtland Cross-Complainants are ordered to show cause as to why their cross-complaint should not be dismissed based on, e.g., ripeness and/or mootness grounds. A response to this order shall be filed by noon of December 5, 2012. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/28/2012. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ANTHONY FREDIANELLI,

9

No. C-11-3232 EMC

Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

v.
STEPHAN JENKINS, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
___________________________________/
14
15

Eric Godtland and Eric Godtland Management, Inc. (“EGM”) have filed a motion for leave

16

to amend which is currently set for hearing on December 14, 2012. However, before the merits of

17

that motion may be considered, the Godtland Cross-Complainants should address whether it is

18

appropriate for them to even continue with their cross-complaint in light of the fact that the

19

accountants (i.e., David Rawon and the Zeisler firm) have dropped their claims against the Godtland

20

Cross-Complainants. See Docket No. 142 (stipulation and order dismissing, inter alia, the

21

accountants’ claims against Mr. Godtland and EGM).

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27
28

1

Accordingly, the Court hereby orders the Godtland Cross-Complainants to show cause as to

2

why their cross-complaint should not be dismissed based on, e.g., ripeness and/or mootness grounds.

3

A response to this order shall be filed by noon of December 5, 2012.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: November 28, 2012

7

_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2