Anthony Fredianelli v. Stephan Jenkins et al
Filing
278
ORDER re Proposed Limiting Instruction on Third Eye Blind Inter Party Agreements. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/7/2013. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ANTHONY FREDIANELLI,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-11-3232 EMC
STEPHAN JENKINS, et al.,
12
PROPOSED LIMITING INSTRUCTION
ON THIRD EYE BLIND INTER PARTY
AGREEMENTS
Defendants.
___________________________________/
(Docket No. 230)
13
14
As stated at the hearing on October 7, 2013, the Court shall allow Plaintiff to introduce the
15
Third Eye Blind Inter Party Agreements as evidence but subject to a limiting instruction. Below is
16
the Court’s proposed limiting instruction. Any objections shall be addressed prior to the
17
introduction of the evidence.
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
INSTRUCTION NO. 1.8
2
EVIDENCE FOR LIMITED PURPOSE –
3
“THIRD EYE BLIND INTER PARTY AGREEMENTS”
4
5
6
The document “Third Eye Blind Inter Party Agreements” is being admitted for a limited
purpose only. You must consider it only for that limited purpose and for no other.
The document “Third Eye Blind Inter Party Agreements” does not constitute the parties’
7
contract but may be considered as evidence of what the terms of the parties’ oral agreement were.
8
Although the document refers to Band members being shareholders, the Court has already found that
9
there was in fact no agreement to this business structure.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
IT IS SO ORDERED
12
13
Dated: October 7, 2013
14
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?