Randall et al v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Stipulation for extension of time to complete settlement conference filed by Sharon Randall. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 12/16/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2011)

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # 69888
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, CA 94621
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq./ State Bar # 109173
LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET
486 41st Street, # 3
Oakland, CA 94609
Telephone and Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
James F. Hodgkins. Esq./ State Bar # 142561
Supervising Trial Attorney
Oakland City Attorney’s Office
One Frank Ogawa Plaza, Sixth Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHARON RANDALL, as guardian ad litem for
JAMAR BRYANT, a minor, and,
SHARON RANDALL,

Action No. C-11-3288-JSC (LB)
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal orporation;
HOWARD JORDAN, in his capacity as Acting
Chief of Police for CITY OF OAKLAND; and,
DOES 1-25, inclusive, individually, and in their
capacity as police officers for CITY OF OAKLAND,
Defendants.

/

STIPULATION
All parties to this action stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel, as follows:
1. The parties have not yet conducted any discovery;

2. It is necessary for plaintiff’s counsel to file a Stipulation and Order for Leave to File First
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

1

Amended Complaint and First Amended Complaint in order to substitute the names of defendant
officers for DOE defendants. Although plaintiffs’ counsel still does not have more clear information
or documents regarding who was present at the subject incident; which OPD officers were actually
involved in the subject incident; what OPD officers allege occurred; any plaintiff, OPD officers, or
witness information or statements that were taken by OPD; and/or any photographs that were taken of
the scene or persons at the scene by OPD, defense counsel has produced the names of the OPD officers
who were involved;
3. The parties cannot conduct a meaningful Settlement Conference at this time for the above-stated
reasons;
5. Therefore, good cause appearing, and counsel have conferred and agreed, the parties request that
this Court continue the Settlement Conference presently scheduled for
December 20, 2011 to a date approximately sixty (60) days from that date;
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET

Dated:

By: /s/
GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

Dated:

By: /s/
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

2

OAKLAND CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

Dated:

By: /s/
JAMES F. HODGKINS, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated
by a conformed signature, indicated as “/s/ ” within this E-filed document.

Dated:

By:
GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq.

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The settlement conference shall
be completed by February 21, 2012.
Dated: December 16, 2011
HONORABLE JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States District Court Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

3