Allen v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Filing 55

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/11/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Richard G. Grotch, Esq. – SBN 127713
Gina J. Beltramo, Esq. – SBN 203809
CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH
A Professional Corporation, Lawyers
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300
Redwood City, CA 94065-2133
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant
UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

CHRISTINE ALLEN,

12

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14

UNITED AIR LINES, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOE ONE through DOE
ONE HUNDRED, inclusive,

15
16

Defendants.

Case No. C 11-3326 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

17

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff CHRISTINE ALLEN and

18
19

defendant UNITED AIR LINES, INC., through their respective counsel of record, that all the

20

claims of plaintiff be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the

21
22

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear her or its own attorneys’ fees and costs

23

of suit.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27
28

///
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case No: CV 11 3326 RS

SO STIPULATED.

1
2

Dated: February 11, 2013

THE BOCCARDO LAW FIRM

3

/s/ James P. Collins
By: _____________________________
James P. Collins
Attorney for Plaintiff
Christine Allen

4
5
6
7
8

Dated: February 11, 2013

CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH

9

/s/ Richard G. Grotch
By: _____________________________
Richard G. Grotch (*)
Attorney for Defendant
United Air Lines, Inc.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

(*)

I hereby attest that I have on file all
Holographic signatures indicated by a
“conformed” signature (/s/)
within this e-filed document.

17
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Upon consideration of the foregoing Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, it is hereby

19
20

ordered that the claims of plaintiff CHRISTINE ALLEN be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice

21

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear her or its own

22

attorneys’ fees and costs of suit.

23

11
Dated: February __, 2013

24

__________________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case No: CV 11 3326 RS