Jackson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit et al

Filing 6

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT AND PAUPER APPLICATION (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8

CLARENCE JACKSON,
Plaintiff,

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 11-3355 SI (pr)
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE
FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
PAUPER APPLICATION

v.
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT;
et al.,
Defendants.
/

13
14

Clarence Jackson filed a pro se civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court cannot

15

understand Jackson’s claims because the complaint is devoid of any information about Jackson’s

16

factual allegations, claims or requested relief. The handwritten pleading simply states the names

17

of the defendants and refers to attached sheets for the statement of the claim. There are no

18

attachments to the complaint.

19

Jackson has filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file both an amended

20

complaint and his in forma pauperis application because he was recently released from Santa

21

Rita Jail. Upon due consideration, the court GRANTS Jackson’s motion. (Docket # 5.)

22

Jackson must file his amended complaint and in forma pauperis application no later than

23

November 11, 2011. Failure to file the amended complaint and in forma pauperis application

24

by the deadline will result in dismissal of this action. No further extension of this deadline will

25

be granted.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 24, 2011
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge