Tarasovsky v. Stratify, Inc. Group Short Term Disability Plan and Long Term Disability Plan et al

Filing 50

FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 18, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ERNEST TARASOVSKY, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 11-03359 WHA Plaintiff, v. FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER 14 STRATIFY, INC. GROUP SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN AND LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 FOR GOOD CAUSE and after a final pretrial conference, the Court issues the 18 19 following final pretrial order: 1. In lieu of a live bench trial, the parties agree that the matter will be tried based on 20 written briefing and a documentary trial record submitted by the parties. The prior trial date of 21 January 7 is accordingly VACATED. 22 2. The parties shall prepare a stipulated, joint appendix of exhibits and recorded 23 testimony. This joint appendix, together with the administrative record already lodged with the 24 Court, shall constitute the complete the trial record. The parties have WAIVED all evidentiary 25 objections of any type to the trial record. 26 3. Plaintiff’s trial brief, the joint appendix, and defendants’ opening brief amended 27 to contain correct cites to the trial record shall be submitted by JANUARY 3 AT NOON. The 28 parties may file rebuttal briefs no longer than five pages in length by JANUARY 17 AT NOON. 1 2 4. Following submission of the parties’ rebuttal briefs, the matter shall be considered fully submitted on the papers. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: December 18, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?