Tarasovsky v. Stratify, Inc. Group Short Term Disability Plan and Long Term Disability Plan et al
Filing
50
FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 18, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ERNEST TARASOVSKY,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 11-03359 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER
14
STRATIFY, INC. GROUP SHORT TERM
DISABILITY PLAN AND LONG TERM
DISABILITY PLAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
FOR GOOD CAUSE and after a final pretrial conference, the Court issues the
18
19
following final pretrial order:
1.
In lieu of a live bench trial, the parties agree that the matter will be tried based on
20
written briefing and a documentary trial record submitted by the parties. The prior trial date of
21
January 7 is accordingly VACATED.
22
2.
The parties shall prepare a stipulated, joint appendix of exhibits and recorded
23
testimony. This joint appendix, together with the administrative record already lodged with the
24
Court, shall constitute the complete the trial record. The parties have WAIVED all evidentiary
25
objections of any type to the trial record.
26
3.
Plaintiff’s trial brief, the joint appendix, and defendants’ opening brief amended
27
to contain correct cites to the trial record shall be submitted by JANUARY 3 AT NOON. The
28
parties may file rebuttal briefs no longer than five pages in length by JANUARY 17 AT NOON.
1
2
4.
Following submission of the parties’ rebuttal briefs, the matter shall be
considered fully submitted on the papers.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: December 18, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?