Ferguson v. Horizon Lines, Inc. et al

Filing 26

ORDER by Judge Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment Responses due by 7/9/2012. Replies due by 7/23/2012. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 Northern District of California 6 7 LORRAINE FERGUSON, No. CV11-3391 MEJ Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 HORIZON LINES, INC., et al., 10 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 14 ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES (DKT. NO. 22) Defendants. _____________________________________/ Having reviewed Plaintiff’s administrative motion to extend certain discovery deadlines (Dkt. No. 22) and Defendant’s response (Dkt. No. 23), the Court rules as follows: 1. The discovery cutoff is extended until June 27, 2012 with respect to Michael Bohlman, 15 July 27, 2012 with respect to Mitchell Stoller, and July 9, 2012 with respect to the disclosure of 16 Stoller’s expert report. The Court notes that this is the second time the discovery deadlines have 17 been amended and Plaintiff is unlikely to receive another extension. 18 2. The hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, currently calendared for July 19 12, 2012, is continued until August 2, 2012. Plaintiff’s opposition is due July 9, 2012. If 20 Defendants wish to file a reply, they must do so by July 23, 2012. 21 3. The trial in this matter, currently set for October 29, 2012, is hereby VACATED, along 22 with the corresponding pretrial deadlines. The Court will issue a new trial schedule after it rules on 23 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 20, 2012 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?