Ferguson v. Horizon Lines, Inc. et al
Filing
26
ORDER by Judge Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment Responses due by 7/9/2012. Replies due by 7/23/2012. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
Northern District of California
6
7
LORRAINE FERGUSON,
No. CV11-3391 MEJ
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
HORIZON LINES, INC., et al.,
10
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
13
14
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES
(DKT. NO. 22)
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
Having reviewed Plaintiff’s administrative motion to extend certain discovery deadlines
(Dkt. No. 22) and Defendant’s response (Dkt. No. 23), the Court rules as follows:
1. The discovery cutoff is extended until June 27, 2012 with respect to Michael Bohlman,
15
July 27, 2012 with respect to Mitchell Stoller, and July 9, 2012 with respect to the disclosure of
16
Stoller’s expert report. The Court notes that this is the second time the discovery deadlines have
17
been amended and Plaintiff is unlikely to receive another extension.
18
2. The hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, currently calendared for July
19
12, 2012, is continued until August 2, 2012. Plaintiff’s opposition is due July 9, 2012. If
20
Defendants wish to file a reply, they must do so by July 23, 2012.
21
3. The trial in this matter, currently set for October 29, 2012, is hereby VACATED, along
22
with the corresponding pretrial deadlines. The Court will issue a new trial schedule after it rules on
23
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 20, 2012
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?