SecuGen Corporation v. Suprema, Inc.

Filing 26

STIPULATION and ORDER Temporarily Staying Case. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/4/2011. (rcs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Brian E. Mitchell (SBN 190095) Jigang Jin (SBN 239465) MITCHELL + COMPANY, LAW OFFICES 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 766-3515 Facsimile: (415) 402-0058 Email: info@mcolawoffices.com Craig C. Daniel (SBN 212588) Axcel Law Partners LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 14th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-0704-8800 Facsimile: 415-704-8804 cdaniel@ax-law.com D. James Pak (SBN 194331) BAKER & McKENZIE LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130-3051 Telephone: +1 858 523 6200 Facsimile: +1 858 259 8290 D.James.Pak@bakermckenzie.com Tod Gamlen (SBN 83458) BAKER & McKENZIE LLP 660 Hansen Way Palo Alto, California 94304 Tel: (650) 856-5504 Fax: (650) 856-9299 Tod.Gamlen@bakermckenzie.com Attorneys for Defendant Suprema, Inc. Attorneys for Plaintiff SecuGen Corporation 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 SECUGEN CORPORATION 16 17 18 19 Case No. 11-CV-3450 SI Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TEMPORARILY STAYING CASE v. SUPREMA, INC., et al. Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Baker & McKenzie LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130- 1 Case No. 11-CV-3450 SI JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY 1 2 3 4 Plaintiff SecuGen Corporation (“SecuGen”) and Defendant Suprema, Inc. (“Suprema”) hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, there are currently two pending lawsuits between SecuGen and Suprema; 5 WHEREAS, on July 14, 2011, Plaintiff SecuGen filed this action for patent 6 infringement against Defendant Suprema [D.I. 1] (“the SecuGen Patent Infringement 7 Action”); 8 WHEREAS, on October 14, 2011, SecuGen filed a First Amended Complaint 9 adding as defendants RBH Access Technologies, Inc., RBH USA, Inc. and Apirary, 10 Inc. on the basis that they market or re-sell Suprema’s products in the United States 11 [D.I. 15]; 12 WHEREAS, Suprema’s response to the First Amended Complaint is due on 13 December 1, 2011 [D.I. 18], and the Case Management Conference has been 14 scheduled for January 13, 2012 [D.I. 13]; 15 WHEREAS, on June 7, 2011, prior to the filing of the present action, Suprema 16 filed a Declaratory Judgment action in this District Court against SecuGen, seeking, 17 inter alia, a declaration as valid and enforceable a “No Proceeding Clause” in an OEM 18 Agreement between Suprema and SecuGen dated May 6, 2009, [Case No. 3:11-cv- 19 02783-WHA (“the Suprema Contract Action”)]. 20 Proceeding Clause” is valid and enforceable, and has counterclaimed for breach of 21 contract and fraud, SecuGen denies that the “No 22 WHEREAS, in the Suprema Contract Action, Suprema alleges that under the 23 No Proceeding Clause SecuGen is precluded from initiating any adverse proceeding 24 against Suprema, including any action for infringement of any of SecuGen’s IP rights, 25 during the term of the OEM Agreement, which is set to expire on May 6, 2012; and 26 WHEREAS, SecuGen and Suprema agree that the OEM Agreement does not 27 bar SecuGen’s pursuit of a patent infringement action against Suprema for products 28 2 Baker & McKenzie LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130 Case No. 11-CV-3450 SI JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY 1 sold or offered for sale on or after May 6, 2012, and therefore currently agree, at a 2 minimum, to stay the SecuGen Patent Infringement Action until May 6, 2012, 3 without prejudice to any party seeking to extend such stay pending resolution of the 4 Suprema Contract Action. 5 6 7 8 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties and the parties respectfully request the Court as follows: (1) The present SecuGen Patent Infringement Action shall be stayed until May 6, 2012; (2) 9 Defendants responses to the First Amended Complaint in the present 10 SecuGen Patent Infringement Action shall be due within fourteen (14) days of the lift 11 of the stay; and 12 (3) Nothing in this stipulation prevents any party from requesting an 13 extension of this stay from the Court pending resolution of the Suprema Contract 14 Action. 15 16 Dated: December 1, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 SecuGen Corporation Suprema, Inc. ______/s/_________ Brian E. Mitchell _____/s/________ D. James Pak Attorneys for Plaintiff SecuGen Corporation Attorneys for Defendant Suprema, Inc. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Baker & McKenzie LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 4 December __, 2011 ____________________________ Susan Ilston United States District Judge 3 Case No. 11-CV-3450 SI JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY ATTESTATION PER GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Craig C. Daniel, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that the counsel listed above have concurred with this filing. Dated: December 1, 2011 /s/_________ Craig C. Daniel Attorneys for SecuGen Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?