SecuGen Corporation v. Suprema, Inc.
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER Temporarily Staying Case. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/4/2011. (rcs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Brian E. Mitchell (SBN 190095)
Jigang Jin (SBN 239465)
MITCHELL + COMPANY, LAW
OFFICES
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 766-3515
Facsimile: (415) 402-0058
Email: info@mcolawoffices.com
Craig C. Daniel (SBN 212588)
Axcel Law Partners LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-0704-8800
Facsimile: 415-704-8804
cdaniel@ax-law.com
D. James Pak (SBN 194331)
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor
San Diego, CA 92130-3051
Telephone: +1 858 523 6200
Facsimile: +1 858 259 8290
D.James.Pak@bakermckenzie.com
Tod Gamlen (SBN 83458)
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
660 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: (650) 856-5504
Fax: (650) 856-9299
Tod.Gamlen@bakermckenzie.com
Attorneys for Defendant Suprema, Inc.
Attorneys for Plaintiff SecuGen Corporation
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
SECUGEN CORPORATION
16
17
18
19
Case No. 11-CV-3450 SI
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TEMPORARILY STAYING
CASE
v.
SUPREMA, INC., et al.
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
12544 High Bluff Drive,
Third Floor
San Diego, CA 92130-
1
Case No. 11-CV-3450 SI
JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY
1
2
3
4
Plaintiff SecuGen Corporation (“SecuGen”) and Defendant Suprema, Inc.
(“Suprema”) hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, there are currently two pending lawsuits between SecuGen and
Suprema;
5
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2011, Plaintiff SecuGen filed this action for patent
6
infringement against Defendant Suprema [D.I. 1] (“the SecuGen Patent Infringement
7
Action”);
8
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2011, SecuGen filed a First Amended Complaint
9
adding as defendants RBH Access Technologies, Inc., RBH USA, Inc. and Apirary,
10
Inc. on the basis that they market or re-sell Suprema’s products in the United States
11
[D.I. 15];
12
WHEREAS, Suprema’s response to the First Amended Complaint is due on
13
December 1, 2011 [D.I. 18], and the Case Management Conference has been
14
scheduled for January 13, 2012 [D.I. 13];
15
WHEREAS, on June 7, 2011, prior to the filing of the present action, Suprema
16
filed a Declaratory Judgment action in this District Court against SecuGen, seeking,
17
inter alia, a declaration as valid and enforceable a “No Proceeding Clause” in an OEM
18
Agreement between Suprema and SecuGen dated May 6, 2009, [Case No. 3:11-cv-
19
02783-WHA (“the Suprema Contract Action”)].
20
Proceeding Clause” is valid and enforceable, and has counterclaimed for breach of
21
contract and fraud,
SecuGen denies that the “No
22
WHEREAS, in the Suprema Contract Action, Suprema alleges that under the
23
No Proceeding Clause SecuGen is precluded from initiating any adverse proceeding
24
against Suprema, including any action for infringement of any of SecuGen’s IP rights,
25
during the term of the OEM Agreement, which is set to expire on May 6, 2012; and
26
WHEREAS, SecuGen and Suprema agree that the OEM Agreement does not
27
bar SecuGen’s pursuit of a patent infringement action against Suprema for products
28
2
Baker & McKenzie LLP
12544 High Bluff Drive,
Third Floor
San Diego, CA 92130
Case No. 11-CV-3450 SI
JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY
1
sold or offered for sale on or after May 6, 2012, and therefore currently agree, at a
2
minimum, to stay the SecuGen Patent Infringement Action until May 6, 2012,
3
without prejudice to any party seeking to extend such stay pending resolution of the
4
Suprema Contract Action.
5
6
7
8
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties and the parties
respectfully request the Court as follows:
(1)
The present SecuGen Patent Infringement Action shall be stayed until
May 6, 2012;
(2)
9
Defendants responses to the First Amended Complaint in the present
10
SecuGen Patent Infringement Action shall be due within fourteen (14) days of the lift
11
of the stay; and
12
(3)
Nothing in this stipulation prevents any party from requesting an
13
extension of this stay from the Court pending resolution of the Suprema Contract
14
Action.
15
16
Dated: December 1, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
17
18
SecuGen Corporation
Suprema, Inc.
______/s/_________
Brian E. Mitchell
_____/s/________
D. James Pak
Attorneys for Plaintiff SecuGen
Corporation
Attorneys for Defendant Suprema, Inc.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
12544 High Bluff Drive,
Third Floor
San Diego, CA 92130
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
4
December __, 2011
____________________________
Susan Ilston
United States District Judge
3
Case No. 11-CV-3450 SI
JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY
ATTESTATION PER GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Craig C. Daniel, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that the counsel
listed above have concurred with this filing.
Dated: December 1, 2011
/s/_________
Craig C. Daniel
Attorneys for SecuGen Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?