Minix v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND VACATING NOVEMBER 18, 2011 HEARING (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DELORES MINIX,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
No. C 11-03478 SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE; AND
VACATING NOVEMBER 18, 2011
HEARING
v.
11
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al.,
12
Defendants.
/
13
14
15
On July 14, 2011, plaintiff – who is represented by counsel – filed this suit in Santa Clara County
16
Superior Court. Defendants removed this action to the Northern District of California and the matter
17
was assigned to Judge Jeremy Fogel. On September 28, 2011, the case was re-assigned to Judge Susan
18
Illston, located at the federal courthouse at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94010.
19
On July 22, 2011, defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic
20
Registration Systems, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff did not file a timely
21
reply to this motion. However, because the case was re-assigned to Judge Illston, all of the matters
22
scheduled for hearing were vacated and the parties were order to re-file their motions. On September
23
30, 2011, defendants JP Morgan Chase and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems re-filed their
24
motion to dismiss. Doc. 21. The motion is scheduled for a hearing on November 18, 2011. Pursuant
25
to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), plaintiff’s opposition was due by October 14, 2011. Plaintiff has not yet filed
26
an opposition, nor has she communicated in any way with the Court concerning these matters.
27
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing to be filed no later than
28
November 28, 2011, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
1
See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(b). Plaintiff is notified that an inadequate or untimely response will result in
2
dismissal. The November 18, 2011 hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss is VACATED, and
3
will be rescheduled if necessary.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: November 14, 2011
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?