Reiffin v. Microsoft Corporation et al

Filing 63

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/19/2011. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. C 11-03505 CRB

MARTIN GARDNER REIFFIN,

v.
MICROSOFT CORP. ET AL.,

15

Defendants.

/

16

In combination with his Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants

17
18

Gates and Ballmer, Plaintiff filed a “Request for Reconsideration of Order Granting Motion

19

to Dismiss Filed by Defendant Microsoft Corp.” See dkt. 62. Plaintiff’s filing is

20

procedurally improper for several reasons. Most important, Local Rule 7-9(a) involves

21

motions for reconsideration of interlocutory orders “[b]efore the entry of a judgment.” The

22

Court has already entered judgment for Defendant Microsoft and against Plaintiff. See dkt.

23

40.1 Plaintiff is surely aware of this fact, as he has already appealed that judgment. See dkt.

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28
1

Plaintiff also did not receive leave from the Court to file a motion for reconsideration,

per Local Rule 7-9(a), nor did he satisfy any of the requirements of Local Rule 7-9(b).

1
2

43. Accordingly, the Request for Reconsideration is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated: December 19, 2011

5

CHARLES R. BREYER

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

G:\CRBALL\2011\3505\order re reconsideration 2.wpd

2