China Ritar Power Corproation v. Pope Investments LLC

Filing 21

ORDER granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/9/2012 02:30 PM. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)

1 Michael J. Coffino (SBN 88109)
[e-mail]
2 Jaime J. Santos (SBN 276344)
[e-mail]
3 THE CRONE LAW GROUP
101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2650
4 San Francisco, CA 94104
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff China Ritar Power
7 Corporation
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11 CHINA RITAR POWER CORPORATION, a
Nevada corporation,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
POPE INVESTMENTS LLC, a Delaware limited
15 liability company,
16

Defendant.

Case No. CV-11-3529 (SI)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFF CHINA RITAR POWER
CORPORATION’S UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO (1) EXTEND ALL
DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THE
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
ADR DEADLINES, AND (2) RESET CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

17
18
19

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s MOTION TO (1) EXTEND ALL DEADLINES SET

20 FORTH IN THE ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
21 ADR DEADLINES, AND (2) RESET CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, it is hereby
22 ORDERED that the case management schedule is revised as follows:
23

By February 6, 2012, the parties will

24

meet and confer regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process

25

selection, and discovery plan

26

file ADR Certification

27

file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference

28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND CMC AND ADR DEADLINES

1

By February 21, 2012, the parties will

2

file 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report

3

and file Case Management Statement

4

The Initial Case Management Conference will be rescheduled for March 9, 2012 at 2:30

th
5 p.m. in Courtroom 10, 19 floor, San Francisco.

6
7
8

1/10/12
Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge
for the Northern District of California

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND CMC AND ADR DEADLINES