Ansari et al v. ABC Legal Services, Inc. et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 60 to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) filed by ABC Legal Services, Inc., Mirjana Ansari, Allen Ansari. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/10/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575)
CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.
12 South First Street, Suite 1014
San Jose, California 95113-2418
Telephone Number: [phone]
Facsimile Number: [phone]
Email Address: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ALLEN ANSARI and MIRJANA ANSARI

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
10
11

ALLEN ANSARI and MIRJANA ANSARI,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14
15

v.
ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC., a Washington
corporation, and MICHELLE J. PEMBLETON,
individually and in her official capacity,

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)

Defendants.

16
17
18

Case No. 3:11-CV-03542-EMC

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs, ALLEN ANSARI and MIRJANA ANSARI, and
Defendant, ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC., stipulate, and the Court hereby orders, as follows:

19

1.

The dispute between the parties has been settled, therefore, the claims asserted by

20
21

Plaintiffs, ALLEN ANSARI and MIRJANA ANSARI, against Defendants, ABC LEGAL SERVICES,

22

INC., and MICHELLE J. PEMBLETON, in the above-captioned proceeding are hereby dismissed, with

23

prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).

24

///

25

///

26
27
28

///
///
-1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 3:11-CV-03542-EMC

1

Dated: December 20, 2012

/s/ Fred W. Schwinn
Fred W. Schwinn, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ALLEN ANSARI and MIRJANA ANSARI

Dated: December 20, 2012

/s/ William S. Weisberg
William S. Weisberg, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
THE FOREGOING STIPULATION
IS APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED.

ER

H

16

R NIA

n

M. Che

FO

RT

15

dward
Judge E

NO

14

The Honorable Edward M. Chen
DERED
SO OR
SDistrict Court
Judge ofT I
I the

LI

13

1/10/13

UNIT
ED

12

Dated:

RT
U
O

11

S

10

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

9

N

17

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 3:11-CV-03542-EMC