Toyota Motor Corporation et al v. Efficient Drivetrains Inc. et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 Stipulation filed by Efficient Drivetrains Inc., The Regents of the University of California. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/21/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2011)

L OS A NGELES

A TTORNEYS A T L AW

R OBINS , K APLAN , M ILLER & C IRESI L.L.P.

10
11
12

R NIA

re

mes Wa
Judge Ja

ER

H

9

RT

8

David Martinez, Bar No. 193183
[e-mail]
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
310-229-5800

NO

7

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

FO

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION AND
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC.

LI

5

RT
U
O

4

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

3

S

2

Megan Whyman Olesek, Bar No. 191218
[e-mail]
KENYON & KENYON LLP
1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650-384-4701

UNIT
ED

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

Attorneys for Defendant
EFFICIENT DRIVETRAINS INC. and
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18

TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION and
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC.,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21
22

Case No. CV-11-03570-JW
STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION
OF TIME THROUGH JANUARY 6, 2012 TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

vs.
Action Filed:

July 20, 2011

Complaint Served:

October 21, 2011

Current Response Date:

EFFICIENT DRIVETRAINS INC. and
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA,

December 22, 2011

Defendants.

23

[Proposed] Response Date: January 6, 2012

24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants Efficient Drivetrains Inc. and The Regents of
the University of California (hereinafter “Defendants”), and Plaintiffs, Toyota Motor Corporation
and Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. (hereinafter, “Plaintiffs”), stipulate as follows:
82719677.1

SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CV 11-03570 JW

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS, Defendants’ original deadline to respond to the Complaint was November
14, 2011;
WHEREAS, the Court granted a First Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint and
set December 22, 2011 as the current deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint;

5

WHEREAS the Case Management Conference is currently set for January 23, 2012;

6

WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement in principle and expect to finalize the

8
9
10

L OS A NGELES

A TTORNEYS A T L AW

R OBINS , K APLAN , M ILLER & C IRESI L.L.P.

7

11
12
13
14

settlement before the end of the year;
WHEREAS, the parties believe that an extension for Defendants to answer or respond to
the Complaint would therefore be in the interest of judicial efficiency and preservation of party
resources;
WHEREAS, this Stipulation complies with Local Rule 6-1(a) in that the underlying
extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Defendants shall have until January 6, 2012 to answer
or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

15
16

Respectfully submitted,
DATED: December 20, 2011

17

KENYON & KENYON LLP
By:

18
19
20
21

/s/ Megan Whyman Olesek
Megan Whyman Olesek, Bar No. 191218
1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Tel: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION and TOYOTA
MOTOR SALES, USA, INC.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
82719677.1

-2-

SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CV 11-03570 JW

1 DATED: December 20, 2011

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

2

By: /s/ David Martinez
David Martinez, Bar No. 193183
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208
Tel: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

3
4
5

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
EFFICIENT DRIVETRAINS INC. and THE REGENTS OF
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

6

8
9
10

L OS A NGELES

A TTORNEYS A T L AW

R OBINS , K APLAN , M ILLER & C IRESI L.L.P.

7

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
82719677.1

-3-

SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CV 11-03570 JW