Khan v. S & C Electric Company
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING re 31 Letter filed by S & C Electric Company for Suheily Natal to appear by phone at the cmc on 2/3/12 at 1:30 PM. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Speo on 1/31/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2012)
LAW OFFICES
A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
OF
AND
INDIVIDUALS
55 East Monroe Street, Suite 2900, Chicago, Illinois 60603
Tel (312) 332-0777 Fax (312) 332-6130
www.fordharrison.com
Writer's Direct Dial:
SUHEILY NATAL
(312) 960-6138
snatal@fordharrison.com
January 27, 2012
VIA ECF
Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero
San Francisco Courthouse
Courtroom G - 15th Floor
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Re:
Request for Telephonic Appearance
Mohammad Khan v. S&C Electric Company (N.D. Cal. No. 3:11-cv-03621)
Dear Magistrate Judge Spero:
The undersigned counsel for Defendant, S&C Electric Company, respectfully requests
permission from the Court to appear telephonically at the continued Case Management
Conference scheduled in the above-referenced action on February 3, 2012, commencing at 1:30
p.m. (Pacific Standard Time). If permitted to appear telephonically, the undersigned counsel
may be reached at the following direct land line phone number: (312) 960-6138.
Very truly yours,
NO
RT
Judge Jo
S
seph C.
ER
pero
A
H
cc:
R NIA
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO
/s/ Suheily Natal
Suheily Natal
Admitted pro hac vice
Attorney for Defendant S&C Electric Company
FO
UNIT
ED
SN:dlw
TC
LI
Dated: Jan. 31, 2012
TE
TA
FORD & HARRISON LLP
RT
U
O
S
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
counsel shall be on phone standby
beginning at 1:30 PM and await
the Court's call.
S DISTRIC
C
N
F
Seth W. Wiener, Counsel for Plaintiff Mohammad Khan
D IS
TO
T RIC
Chicago:370774.1
ATLANTA
MEMPHIS
• ASHEVILLE
• BIRMINGHAM • CHICAGO • DALLAS • DENVER
• PHOENIX
• MIAMI • MINNEAPOLIS • NEW YORK • ORLANDO
•
•
JACKSONVILLE
SPARTANBURG
•
•
LOS ANGELES • MELBOURNE
TAMPA • WASHINGTON, D.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?