Khan v. S & C Electric Company

Filing 34

ORDER GRANTING re 31 Letter filed by S & C Electric Company for Suheily Natal to appear by phone at the cmc on 2/3/12 at 1:30 PM. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Speo on 1/31/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2012)

Download PDF
LAW OFFICES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS OF AND INDIVIDUALS 55 East Monroe Street, Suite 2900, Chicago, Illinois 60603 Tel (312) 332-0777 Fax (312) 332-6130 www.fordharrison.com Writer's Direct Dial: SUHEILY NATAL (312) 960-6138 snatal@fordharrison.com January 27, 2012 VIA ECF Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero San Francisco Courthouse Courtroom G - 15th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Request for Telephonic Appearance Mohammad Khan v. S&C Electric Company (N.D. Cal. No. 3:11-cv-03621) Dear Magistrate Judge Spero: The undersigned counsel for Defendant, S&C Electric Company, respectfully requests permission from the Court to appear telephonically at the continued Case Management Conference scheduled in the above-referenced action on February 3, 2012, commencing at 1:30 p.m. (Pacific Standard Time). If permitted to appear telephonically, the undersigned counsel may be reached at the following direct land line phone number: (312) 960-6138. Very truly yours, NO RT Judge Jo S seph C. ER pero A H cc: R NIA ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO /s/ Suheily Natal Suheily Natal Admitted pro hac vice Attorney for Defendant S&C Electric Company FO UNIT ED SN:dlw TC LI Dated: Jan. 31, 2012 TE TA FORD & HARRISON LLP RT U O S IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT counsel shall be on phone standby beginning at 1:30 PM and await the Court's call. S DISTRIC C N F Seth W. Wiener, Counsel for Plaintiff Mohammad Khan D IS TO T RIC Chicago:370774.1 ATLANTA MEMPHIS • ASHEVILLE • BIRMINGHAM • CHICAGO • DALLAS • DENVER • PHOENIX • MIAMI • MINNEAPOLIS • NEW YORK • ORLANDO • • JACKSONVILLE SPARTANBURG • • LOS ANGELES • MELBOURNE TAMPA • WASHINGTON, D.C.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?