Heaton et al v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 16, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DAVID A. HEATON and MARCIALYN J.
HEATON,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 11-03626 WHA

Plaintiffs,
v.

14

HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,

15

Defendant.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

/

16
17

Defendant moves to dismiss a portion of the complaint (Dkt. No. 8). Pursuant to Civil

18

Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to defendant’s motion was due on August 12, 2011, but no

19

such opposition has been received. Plaintiffs David and Marcialyn Heaton are ordered to respond

20

by SEPTEMBER 2, 2011, and show cause for their failure to respond to the motion. This order to

21

show cause does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. The hearing on September 8,

22

2011, is VACATED. A new hearing shall be noticed by the Court if necessary. If plaintiffs do not

23

respond by September 2, this case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: August 16, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE