Bell v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 18

NOTICE REGARDING MOTIONS AND OBJECTION. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 29, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2011: # 1 Certirficate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ELISE BELL,

12
13
14
15
16

No. C 11-03636 WHA
Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

v.
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
SERVICING, INC., AMERICAN
BROKERS CONDUIT, MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS INC., and DEFAULT
RESOLUTION NETWORK,
Defendants.
/

17
18

NOTICE REGARDING
MOTIONS AND OBJECTION

This matter has been reassigned to the undersigned judge. Prior to reassignment,

19

defendants had moved to dismiss and to expunge lis pendens. Pursuant to the reassignment order,

20

those motions were vacated. Thereafter, plaintiff filed a brief in opposition defendants’ motion to

21

expunge lis pendens and a separate brief captioned “objection to removal to federal court based

22

upon lack of subject matter jurisdiction.” The parties shall be on notice that if they want to file a

23

motion they shall do so on the regular 35-day track as set forth by the civil local rules. (This

24

includes plaintiff’s “objection to removal,” which presumably would be noticed for a hearing as a

25

motion to remand. This notice expresses no opinion as to whether such motion would be timely.)

26
27
28

Dated: August 29, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE