Travelers Property Casualty Company of America et al v. Centex Homes

Filing 25

ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting 22 Ex Parte Application (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY
COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut
corporation; FIDELITY & GUARANTY
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa
corporation; THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, a
Connecticut corporation, ST. PAUL
MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, a
Minnesota corporation

Case No. 3:11-CV-03638-MEJ
Hon. Samuel Conti
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE AND/OR
CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE ON
CENTEX HOMES’ MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,

[Filed Concurrently with Ex Parte Application;
and Declaration of Kari M. Myron]

vs.

17
18
19
20
21

CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada partnership; and
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,
Defendant.
Trial Date: Not assigned.

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO OPPOSE AND/OR CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE FOR CENTEX HOMES’ MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN:

2

The Court, having read and considered the ex parte application filed by plaintiffs and

3

counter-defendants Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Fidelity & Guaranty

4

Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and St. Paul Mercury

5

Insurance Company (collectively, “Travelers”) seeking an order continuing the hearing on Centex

6

Homes’ (“Centex”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment from January 27, 2012, to April 20,

7

2012, and/or extending the time for Travelers to file its opposition in response to defendant’s motion

8

for summary judgment from November 18, 2011, to March 23, 2012, HEREBY ORDERS as

9

follows:

10
11
12

1.

The ex parte application is GRANTED.

2.

The hearing on defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment is continued to

February 24, 2012.
3.

Plaintiffs’ opposition in response thereto is due no later than January 30, 2012.

4.

13

Defendant’s reply is due no later than February 6, 2012.

14
15
16

Dated: November 16, 2012

17

____________________________
Samuel Conti,
Judge of the U.S. District Court

18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

1

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO OPPOSE AND CONTINUING THE HEARING DATE FOR CENTEX HOMES’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT