Sarique et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 6

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DFTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/2/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2011)

Case3:11-cv-03641-JCS Document5

Filed08/01/11 Page1 of 4

1 BRYAN CAVE LLP
Andrea M. Hicks, California Bar No. 219836

2 Edward Chung, California Bar No. 256616
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1410

3 San Francisco, CA 94111-3907
Telephone:

4 Facsimile:
Email:

5

[phone]
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
BRYAN CAVE LLP

7 Robert E. Boone III, California Bar No. 132780
120 Broadway, Suite 300

8 Santa Monica, CA 90401-2386
Telephone:

9 Facsimile:
Bryan Cave LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1410
San Francisco, CA 94111-3907

Email:

[phone]
[phone]
[e-mail]

10
Attorneys for Defendants

11 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and PRLAP, INC.
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16 SARIQUE, ELGIN AND DAISY, individuals,

Case No. 3:11-cv-03641-JCS

17

JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT

18

Plaintiffs,
v.

19 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (A.K.A. BANK

[L.R. 6-1(a)]

OF AMERICA HOME LOANS), a
20 Corporation, NATIONAL BANK
ASSOCIATION, a Corporation; PRLAP
21 INC., a Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,

22
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
SF01DOCS\39602.1

1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER

Case3:11-cv-03641-JCS Document5

1
2

Filed08/01/11 Page2 of 4

STIPULATION
Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and PRLAP, Inc. (“Defendants”), and Plaintiffs Elgin

3 Sarique and Daisy Sarique (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate
4 and agree as follows:
5

1.

Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and PRLAP, Inc. removed this matter from

6 Santa Clara County Superior Court on July 25, 2011.
7

2.

After removal to federal court, Defendants have seven (7) days to respond to

8 Plaintiffs’ Complaint. However, Plaintiffs and Defendants are in the process of discussing the

Bryan Cave LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1410
San Francisco, CA 94111-3907

9 informal resolution of this matter.
10

3.

In order to continue the current settlement discussions, reduce cost of litigation for

11 both parties, and potentially unburden the Court’s docket, Plaintiffs grant Defendants an extension
12 to respond to their Complaint. Thus, instead of responding to the Complaint on August 1, 2011
13 (seven days after removal to federal court), the parties agree that Defendants’ time to file and
14 serve their response to the Complaint is extended 15 days.
15

4.

The stipulation will not result in prejudice to any party and its impact on judicial

16 proceedings is not expected to be significant.
17

5.

Nothing in this stipulation shall constitute a waiver of any arguments or defenses

18 that Defendants or Plaintiffs may wish to assert in their pleadings, all of which are expressly
19 reserved.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF01DOCS\39602.1

2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER

Case3:11-cv-03641-JCS Document5

Filed08/01/11 Page3 of 4

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

3
4
Dated: August 1, 2011

LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH GRAHAM

5
6
7

By:

/s/ Kenneth R. Graham
Kenneth R. Graham
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ELGIN SARIQUE and DAISY SARIQUE

8

10 Dated: August 1, 2011
11

BRYAN CAVE LLP
Robert E. Boone
Andrea M. Hicks

12
13

By:

/s/ Andrea M .Hicks
Andrea M. Hicks
Attorneys for Defendants
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and PRLAP, INC.

14
15

S

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

C. Spero

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

LI

H

21

A

H

RT

ER

N

FO

RT

NO

20

R NIA

ORDERED

Judge Joseph

NO

IT IS SO

ER

FO

UNIT
ED

S

Spero
seph C.
Judge Jo
RT
U
O

19

ERED

O ORD

IT IS S

LI

Dated: August 2, 2011

A

18

RT
U
O

17

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

R NIA

16
UNIT
ED

Bryan Cave LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1410
San Francisco, CA 94111-3907

9

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF01DOCS\39602.1

3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER

Case3:11-cv-03641-JCS Document5

Filed08/01/11 Page4 of 4