Aguilar v. Couillaud et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 10 Stipulation filed by Oclaro, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/5/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 GIDON M. CAINE (Cal. State Bar No. 188110) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 275 Middlefield Road Suite 150 Menlo Park, California 94025-4008 Telephone: (650) 838-2000 Facsimile: (650) 838-2001 gidon.caine@alston.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Jessica P. Corley (pro hac vice) Elizabeth P. Skola (pro hac vice) ALSTON & BIRD LLP One Atlantic Center 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Telephone: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 jessica.corley@alston.com elizabeth.skola@alston.com Attorneys for Nominal Defendant OCLARO, INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 TOBY AGUILAR, derivatively on behalf of OCLARO, INC., Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 v. BERNARD COUILLAUD, GREG DOUGHERTY, EDWARD COLLINS, LORI HOLLAND, GIOVANNI BARBAROSSA, ALAIN COUDER, JOEL A. SMITH III, JERRY TURIN, and JAMES HAYNES, Case No. 11-CV-3668-EMC (Derivative Action) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING AGUILAR V. COUILLAUD WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS TO ANY PARTY 22 23 24 25 Defendants. and OCLARO, INC., 26 27 Nominal Defendant. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING AGUILAR V. COUILLAUD CASE NO. 11-CV-03668-EMC 1 WHEREAS, on July 26, 2011, plaintiff Toby Aguilar commenced a derivative action against 2 nominal defendant Oclaro, Inc. (“Oclaro”), and defendants Alain Couder, Jerry Turin, James 3 Haynes, Bernard Couillaud, Giovanni Barbarossa, Edward Collins, Greg Dougherty, Lori Holland, 4 and Joel A. Smith III; 5 6 WHEREAS, on September 8, 2011, plaintiff served Oclaro, but has not served the other defendants; 7 WHEREAS, on September 14, 2011, this Court denied the motion to consolidate Aguilar’s 8 action into In re Oclaro, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 11-CV-3176, without prejudice; 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding dismissal of Aguilar’s action; WHEREAS, none of the defendants has provided or promised anything of value to plaintiff or plaintiff’s counsel as an inducement to dismiss this action; and WHEREAS, the parties concur that notice to Oclaro shareholders is not required since In re Oclaro Derivative Litigation has not been dismissed; NOW THEREFORE, plaintiff and Oclaro, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: Aguilar v. Couillaud, No. 11-CV-3668-EMC (N.D. Cal. filed July 26, 2011), is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs to any party. 18 19 ALSTON & BIRD LLP 20 21 22 23 24 25 DATED: Menlo Park, California September 26, 2011 By: _s/ Gidon M. Caine___________ _ GIDON M. CAINE (Cal. State Bar No. 188110) 275 Middlefield Road Suite 150 Menlo Park, California 94025-4008 Telephone: (650) 838-2000 Facsimile: (650) 838-2001 gidon.caine@alston.com and 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING AGUILAR V. COUILLAUD CASE NO. 11-CV-03176-EMC 1 5 JESSICA P. CORLEY (pro hac vice) ELIZABETH P. SKOLA (pro hac vice) One Atlantic Center 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Telephone: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 jessica.corley@alston.com elizabeth.skola@alston.com 6 Counsel for Nominal Defendant Oclaro, Inc. 7 FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP 2 3 4 8 9 DATED: San Francisco, California September 26, 2011 10 11 12 Counsel for Plaintiff Toby Aguilar 13 14 15 16 17 18 By: _s/ Mark Punzalan___________ _ MARK PUNZALAN (Cal. State Bar No. 247599) 100 Bush Street Suite 1450 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 398-8700 Facsimile: (415) 398-8704 mpunzalan@finkelsteinthompson.com [PROPOSED] ORDER UPON STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Aguilar v. Couillaud, No. 11-CV-3668-EMC (N.D. Cal. filed July 26, 2011) is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs to any party. 19 2. The parties need not provide notice of this dismissal to Oclaro, Inc.’s shareholders. 20 3. The clerk is directed to enter the dismissal of this action forthwith. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 S _ ___________ The Hon. Edward M. Chen ED United States District Judge RDER SO O H ER FO J LI RT 2 . Chen ward M udge Ed NO 28 R NIA IT IS 26 27 _ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING AGUILAR V. COUILLAUD CASE NO. 11-CV-03176-EMC N D IS T IC T R A 25 DATED: San Francisco, California September __, 2011 October 5, 2011 UNIT ED 24 RT U O 23 S DISTRICT TE C TA OF C 1 2 3 I, Gidon M. Caine, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Joint 4 Case Management Statement. In compliance with General Order No. 45, X.B., I hereby attest that 5 Mark Punzalan has concurred in this filing. 6 s/ Gidon M. Caine GIDON M. CAINE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING AGUILAR V. COUILLAUD CASE NO. 11-CV-03176-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?