Chartis Specialty Insurance Company v. Aqua Sciences Engineers, Inc.
Filing
182
ORDER RE: JURY SELECTION. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 10, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
8
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: JURY SELECTION
v.
9
10
AQUA SCIENCES ENGINEERS, INC.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 11-cv-03669-JST
Defendant.
12
The Court hereby notifies all parties that it will use the jury selection method outlined in
13
14
paragraph 9 of Judge Alsup’s “Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial Conference in Civil Jury
15
Cases,” available at cand.uscourts.gov/whaorders. This method is as follows:
Fifteen prospective jurors will be called to fill the jury box and given seat numbers (1
16
17
through 15). Others will remain on the public benches. For those in the jury box, hardship
18
excuses will be considered first and then voir dire will proceed. Some will usually be excused for
19
cause or hardship during voir dire and their seats will be filled as excusals are made. After the
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
panel is passed for cause (or all cause motions are denied), each side may exercise its allotment of
three peremptory challenges against the fifteen in the jury box. Blind challenges are made
simultaneously. Each side writes down the names and seat numbers of those to be stricken. The
nine surviving the challenge process become the final jury. For example, if the plaintiff strikes 1, 5
and 7 and the defendant strikes 2, 4 and 9, then 3, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 151 become the final
jury. If both sides strike one or more of the same candidates, then the nine unstruck jurors with the
///
27
1
28
In a prior Order, the Court suggested the jury would consist of six jurors and three alternates.
ECF No. 166 at 1. That was in error. The Court will seat a jury of nine jurors.
1
lowest seat numbers will be sworn. Once the jury selection is completed, they will be re-seated in
2
the jury box and sworn.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 10, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?