Chartis Specialty Insurance Company v. Aqua Sciences Engineers, Inc.

Filing 96

Order by Hon. Jon S. Tigar denying 95 Motion For Extension of Time to File Case Management Statement.(jstlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 8 Plaintiff, 9 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT v. 10 AQUA SCIENCES ENGINEERS, INC., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 11-cv-03669-JST Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 95 12 13 The parties’ Motion for Administrative Relief, Dkt. No. 95, is DENIED. The motion does 14 not state good cause for extending the deadline for the submission of a case management 15 statement. See, e.g., Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 608 (9th Cir. 1992). 16 Counsel are ordered to file a case management statement forthwith. They are further 17 ordered to include in their statement a description of their efforts to complete alternative dispute 18 resolution with the Honorable Ronald Sabraw, whom the parties jointly identified as their 19 mediator on April 13, 2012. Dkt. No. 36. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 26, 2013 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________ Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?