Chartis Specialty Insurance Company v. Aqua Sciences Engineers, Inc.

Filing 96

Order by Hon. Jon S. Tigar denying 95 Motion For Extension of Time to File Case Management Statement.(jstlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,

8

Plaintiff,

9

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CASE
MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

v.

10

AQUA SCIENCES ENGINEERS, INC.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 11-cv-03669-JST

Defendant.

Re: Dkt. No. 95

12
13

The parties’ Motion for Administrative Relief, Dkt. No. 95, is DENIED. The motion does

14

not state good cause for extending the deadline for the submission of a case management

15

statement. See, e.g., Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 608 (9th Cir. 1992).

16

Counsel are ordered to file a case management statement forthwith. They are further

17

ordered to include in their statement a description of their efforts to complete alternative dispute

18

resolution with the Honorable Ronald Sabraw, whom the parties jointly identified as their

19

mediator on April 13, 2012. Dkt. No. 36.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 26, 2013

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

________________________
Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge