Marsh v. Napolitano
Filing
42
ORDER FOR AMENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR HEARING OF PLAINTIFF JAY MARSH'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES AND DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler; granting 34 Motion to Continue. Motion Hearing reset to September 6, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2012)
Case3:11-cv-03734-LB Document41 Filed07/17/12 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DANIEL RAY BACON, ESQUIRE, SB# 103866
LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL RAY BACON
234 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, California 94102-4515
Telephone: (415) 864-0907
Facsimile: (415) 864-0989
email: bacondr@aol.com
JOSEPH C. HOHENSTEIN, ESQUIRE, PA STATE BAR #69226
ORLOW, KAPLAN & HOHENSTEIN, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
620 Chestnut Street, Suite 656
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
Telephone: (215) 922-1183
Facsimile: (215) 922-0516
email: jhohenstein@orlow.com
Pro Hac Vice
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JAY MARSH
11
E-filing
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
JAY MARSH,
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
vs.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: CV 3:11-3734 LB
PROPOSED ORDER FOR AMENDED
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR HEARING
OF PLAINTIFF JAY MARSH’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES AND
DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
F.R.C.P. Rule 56 (amended 2010)
Date:
Time:
Court:
Judge:
Trial Date:
September 6, 2012
11 a.m.
Courtroom C, 15th Flr.
Hon. Laurel Beeler
None
Case3:11-cv-03734-LB Document41 Filed07/17/12 Page2 of 2
1
2
After considering the parties stipulation for amended briefing schedule for hearing of the
3
parties’ motions for summary judgment pursuant to the Order of this Court [ECF 38] and the
4
requests made therein, the Court GRANTS such requests and Orders as follows::
5
1. September 6, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom C, the Honorable Laurel Beeler, shall
6
be the new hearing date for hearing both Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the
7
alternative Summary Adjudication of Issues and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary
8
Judgment.
Defendant does not need to refile its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and
9
adequate notice has been provided to the Plaintiff for hearing Defendant’s Cross Motion for
10
Summary Judgment on September on September 6, 2012.
11
2. Plaintiff shall: (a) re-submit his Memorandum of Points and Authorities in a new brief
12
with the only change to the new brief being the addition of citations to the Certified
13
Administrative Record with no change of content and said filing shall replace the previous filing
14
[ECF 21]; (b) file his Reply to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
15
Judgment and file his Opposition to Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment in one
16
document and all said documents shall be filed by Plaintiff on August 2, 2012 pursuant to Local
17
Rule 7-2.
18
3. Defendant shall file its Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Cross-Motion
19
for Summary Judgment pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, e.g., on August 9, 2012.
20
4. The parties shall file a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts for both Motions for
21
Summary Judgment on August 2, 2012.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
17
July ____, 2012
25
____________________________________
THE HONORABLE LAUREL BEELER
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER RE BRIEFING & HEARING
PARTIES’ SUM. JUD. MOTIONS
CASE NO.: CV 3:11- 3734 LB
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?