Roman v. Intuary, Inc. et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD - by 11/1/11. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/7/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SUSHILA CHANANA (SBN 254100) DLA PIPER LLP (US) 555 Mission Street, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: 415.836.2500 Fax: 415.836.2501 Email: sushila.chanana@dlapiper.com ROGER BRIAN IRION (SBN 119865) LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN IRION 611 Veterans Boulevard, Suite 209 Redwood City, CA 94063 Tel.: 650.363-2600 Fax: 650-363-2606 Email: birion@thedesq.com MONICA L. THOMPSON (pro hac vice) ERIN E. WRIGHT (pro hac vice) DLA PIPER LLP (US) 203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1900 Chicago, IL 60601-1293 Tel: 312.368.4000 Fax: 312.236.7516 Email: monica.thompson@dlapiper.com Email: erin.wright@dlapiper.com BRUCE HOWARD LITTLE (pro hac vice) CARRIE RYAN GALLIA (pro hac vice) CHRISTOPHER R. SULLIVAN (pro hac vice) LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-2274 Tel: (612) 371-3211 Fax: (612) 371-3207 Email: blittle@lindquist.com Email: cryangallia@lindquist.com Email: csullivan@lindquist.com Attorneys for Defendants INTUARY, INC. and AJAY GODHWANI 11 Attorney for Plaintiff AMY ROMAN 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 17 AMY ROMAN, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 CASE NO. 3:11 CV 03739 - JCS v. INTUARY, INC. and AJAY GODHWANI, Defendant. STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD Judge: Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero Courtroom: G, 15th Floor 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DLA P IPER LLP (US) WEST\224801143.1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD 3:11 CV 03739 - JCS 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 of the Northern District of California, it is hereby stipulated 2 and agreed by Plaintiff Amy Roman and Defendants Intuary, Inc. and Ajay Godhwani 3 (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, as follows: 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint on July 29, 2011; 5 WHEREAS, Defendants were properly served on September 21, 2011; 6 WHEREAS, Defendants retained counsel thereafter; 7 WHEREAS, Defendants’ current deadline to answer or otherwise plead is October 11, 8 9 2011; WHEREAS, the last day to meet and confer is October 14, 2011, pursuant to this Court’s 10 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, which was entered on 11 July 29, 2011; 12 13 14 15 WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend by twenty-one (21) days the date for Defendants to move to dismiss, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint; WHEREAS, the parties agree that Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by November 1, 2011. 16 17 Dated: October 5, 2011 18 DLA PIPER LLP (US) By: /s/ Sushila Chanana SUSHILA CHANANA Attorneys for Defendants Intuary, Inc. and Ajay Godhwani 19 20 21 22 Dated: October 5, 2011 23 LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN IRION By: /s/ Roger Brian Irion ROGER BRIAN IRION Attorneys for Plaintiff Amy Roman 24 25 26 27 28 -1- DLA P IPER LLP (US) WEST\224801143.1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD 3:11 CV 03739 - JCS 1 ATTESTATION 2 3 I, Sushila Chanana, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 4 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR 5 OTHERWISE PLEAD. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Roger 6 Brian Irion has concurred in this filing. 7 8 Dated: October 5, 2011 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 9 By: /s/ Sushila Chanana SUSHILA CHANANA Attorneys for Defendants Intuary, Inc. and Ajay Godhwani 10 11 12 ER R NIA A H 18 pero FO RT 17 D RDERE S seph C. Judge Jo NO 16 OO IT IS S LI 15 UNIT ED Dated: Oct. 7, 2011 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 14 S 13 N F D IS T IC T O R C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- DLA P IPER LLP ( US ) WEST\224801143.1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD 3:11 CV 03739 - JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?