Roman v. Intuary, Inc. et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD - by 11/1/11. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/7/11. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SUSHILA CHANANA (SBN 254100)
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: 415.836.2500
Fax: 415.836.2501
Email: sushila.chanana@dlapiper.com
ROGER BRIAN IRION (SBN 119865)
LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN IRION
611 Veterans Boulevard, Suite 209
Redwood City, CA 94063
Tel.: 650.363-2600
Fax: 650-363-2606
Email: birion@thedesq.com
MONICA L. THOMPSON (pro hac vice)
ERIN E. WRIGHT (pro hac vice)
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1900
Chicago, IL 60601-1293
Tel: 312.368.4000
Fax: 312.236.7516
Email: monica.thompson@dlapiper.com
Email: erin.wright@dlapiper.com
BRUCE HOWARD LITTLE (pro hac vice)
CARRIE RYAN GALLIA (pro hac vice)
CHRISTOPHER R. SULLIVAN (pro hac vice)
LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P.
4200 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-2274
Tel: (612) 371-3211
Fax: (612) 371-3207
Email: blittle@lindquist.com
Email: cryangallia@lindquist.com
Email: csullivan@lindquist.com
Attorneys for Defendants
INTUARY, INC. and AJAY GODHWANI
11
Attorney for Plaintiff AMY ROMAN
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
AMY ROMAN,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
CASE NO. 3:11 CV 03739 - JCS
v.
INTUARY, INC. and AJAY
GODHWANI,
Defendant.
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
OR OTHERWISE PLEAD
Judge: Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero
Courtroom: G, 15th Floor
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
WEST\224801143.1
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD
3:11 CV 03739 - JCS
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 of the Northern District of California, it is hereby stipulated
2
and agreed by Plaintiff Amy Roman and Defendants Intuary, Inc. and Ajay Godhwani
3
(“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, as follows:
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint on July 29, 2011;
5
WHEREAS, Defendants were properly served on September 21, 2011;
6
WHEREAS, Defendants retained counsel thereafter;
7
WHEREAS, Defendants’ current deadline to answer or otherwise plead is October 11,
8
9
2011;
WHEREAS, the last day to meet and confer is October 14, 2011, pursuant to this Court’s
10
Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, which was entered on
11
July 29, 2011;
12
13
14
15
WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend by twenty-one (21) days the date for Defendants
to move to dismiss, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint;
WHEREAS, the parties agree that Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to the
Complaint by November 1, 2011.
16
17
Dated: October 5, 2011
18
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
By: /s/ Sushila Chanana
SUSHILA CHANANA
Attorneys for Defendants
Intuary, Inc. and Ajay Godhwani
19
20
21
22
Dated: October 5, 2011
23
LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN IRION
By: /s/ Roger Brian Irion
ROGER BRIAN IRION
Attorneys for Plaintiff Amy Roman
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
WEST\224801143.1
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD
3:11 CV 03739 - JCS
1
ATTESTATION
2
3
I, Sushila Chanana, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
4
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR
5
OTHERWISE PLEAD. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Roger
6
Brian Irion has concurred in this filing.
7
8
Dated: October 5, 2011
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
9
By: /s/ Sushila Chanana
SUSHILA CHANANA
Attorneys for Defendants
Intuary, Inc. and Ajay Godhwani
10
11
12
ER
R NIA
A
H
18
pero
FO
RT
17
D
RDERE
S
seph C.
Judge Jo
NO
16
OO
IT IS S
LI
15
UNIT
ED
Dated: Oct. 7, 2011
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
14
S
13
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
DLA P IPER LLP ( US )
WEST\224801143.1
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD
3:11 CV 03739 - JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?