Interbond Corporation of America v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 13

ORDER granting extension of time to respond. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

William A. Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Philip J. Iovieno (admitted pro hac vice)
Anne M. Nardacci (admitted pro hac vice)
Christopher V. Fenlon (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

13

Counsel for Plaintiffs
INTERBOND CORPORATION OF AMERICA;
P.C. RICHARD & SON LONG ISLAND CORPORATION;
MARTA COOPERATIVE OF AMERICA, INC.; AND
ABC APPLIANCE, INC.

14

[Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page]

12

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17
18

In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI (N.D. Cal.);
3:11-cv-04119-SI (N.D. Cal.)

This Document Relates To Individual Case
Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI (N.D. Cal.);
3:11-cv-04119-SI (N.D. Cal.)

Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)

INTERBOND CORPORATION OF
AMERICA,

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT,
WAIVER OF SERVICE AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Plaintiff,

MDL No. 1827

vs.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2
3

P.C. RICHARD & SON LONG ISLAND
CORPORATION; MARTA
COOPERATIVE OF AMERICA, INC. and
ABC APPLIANCE, INC.
Plaintiffs,

4
5
6
7

vs.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

WHEREAS, plaintiffs Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a BrandsMart USA

2

(“BrandsMart”) and P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, MARTA Cooperative of

3

America, Inc. and ABC Appliance, Inc. (“collectively, PC Richard Plaintiffs”) filed complaints in

4

the above-captioned cases against AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America,

5

Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd.,

6

Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, HannStar Display

7

Corporation, Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., LG

8

Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc. Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (USA),

9

Inc., NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics

10

America, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Inc., Samsung

11

Semiconductor, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics

12

Corporation, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.,

13

Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Toshiba Mobile Display

14

Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Stipulating Defendants”) on June 3, 2011 and June 15, 2011, respectively

15

(“Complaints”);

16
17
18
19
20
21

WHEREAS, BrandsMart and PC Richard Plaintiffs wish to avoid the burden and expense
of serving process on the Stipulating Defendants;
WHEREAS, the Stipulating Defendants desire a reasonable amount of time to respond to
the Complaints; and
WHEREAS, BrandsMart, PC Richard Plaintiffs and the Stipulating Defendants believe
that proceeding on a unified response date will create efficiency for the Court and the parties.

22

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

23

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, BrandsMart and PC Richard Plaintiffs,

24

on the one hand, and the Stipulating Defendants, on the other hand, as follows:

25

1.

The Stipulating Defendants waive service of the Complaints under Federal Rule of

26

Civil Procedure 4(d). This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the Stipulating Defendants

27

of any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of

28

personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER.

1

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

2.

The Stipulating Defendants’ deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise

2

respond to the Complaints will be ninety (90) days from the execution of this stipulation, subject

3

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1).

4

DATED: July 8, 2011

5
6
7
8

/s/ William A. Isaacson
William A. Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Philip J. Iovieno (admitted pro hac vice)
Anne M. Nardacci (admitted pro hac vice)
Christopher V. Fenlon (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13
14

Stuart H. Singer (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

15
16
17
18

Counsel for Plaintiffs
Interbond Corporation of America, P.C. Richard & Son
Long Island Corporation, MARTA Cooperative of
America, Inc. and ABC Appliance, Inc.

19
20
21

_____/s/ Christopher A. Nedeau____________
Christopher A. Nedeau (CA Bar No. 81297)
Carl L. Blumenstein (CA Bar No. 124158)
Katharine Chao (CA Bar No. 247571)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4799
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

22
23
24
25
26
27

Counsel for Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and
AU Optronics Corporation America

28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER.

2

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

_____/s/ Neal A. Potischman____________
Christopher B. Hockett (SBN 121539)
Neal A. Potischman (SBN 254862)
Sandra West (SBN 250389)
Samantha H. Knox (SBN 254427)
Micah G. Block (SBN 270712)
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, California 94025
[phone] / [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Jonathan D. Martin (admitted pro hac vice)
Bradley R. Hansen (admitted pro hac vice)
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
[phone] / [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14

Counsel for Defendants Chimei Innolux Corporation
(f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.), Chi Mei
Optoelectronics USA, Inc., and CMO Japan Co., Ltd.

15
16

_____/s/ Stephen P. Freccero______________
Melvin R. Goldman (CA Bar No. 34097)
Stephen P. Freccero (CA Bar No. 131093)
Derek F. Foran (CA Bar No. 224569)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Counsel for Defendants Epson Electronics America, Inc.
and Epson Imaging Devices Corporation

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

3

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

_____/s/ Ramona M. Emerson_____________
Hugh F. Bangasser (pro hac vice)
Ramona M. Emerson (pro hac vice)
Christopher M. Wyant (pro hac vice)
K&L GATES LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98104
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7

10

Jeffrey L. Bornstein, (CA State Bar No. 99358)
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

11

Counsel for Defendant HannStar Display Corporation

12

_____/s/ Kent M. Roger__________________
Kent M. Roger (CA Bar No. 95987)
Michelle Kim-Szrom (CA Bar No. 252901)
Jennifer L. Calvert (CA Bar No. 258018)
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9

13
14
15
16
17
18

Counsel for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays,
Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

19
20

_____/s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz_____________
Michael R. Lazerwitz, Esq.
Lee F. Berger, Esq.
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN &
HAMILTON LLP
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

21
22
23
24
25
26

Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co. Ltd.
and LG Display America, Inc.

27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

4

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

_____/s/ Michael E. Mumford_____________
Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Counsel for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. and
Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc.

9

/s/ George D. Niespolo__________
George D. Niespolo (CA Bar No. 72107)
Stephen H. Sutro (CA Bar No. 172168)
DUANE MORRIS LLP
1 Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2200
San Francisco, CA 94105-1104
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14
15

Counsel for Defendants NEC Corporation of America,
NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., and NEC
Electronics America, Inc.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

5

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

_____/s/ Neil K. Roman_____________
Robert D. Wick (Pro hac vice)
Derek Ludwin (Pro hac vice)
Neil K. Roman (Pro hac vice)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7

Simon J. Frankel
Jeffrey Michael Davidson
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-591-6000
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12

Counsel for Defendants Samsung
Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics
Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

13
14
15

_____/s/ Allison A. Davis________________
Allison A. Davis (CA Bar No. 139203)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111-6533
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

16
17
18
19

Nick S. Verwolf (pro hac vice)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
777 – 108th Ave. N.E., Suite 2300
Bellevue, WA 98004
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

20
21
22
23
24

Counsel for Defendant Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co.,
Ltd.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

6

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

_____/s/ Jacob R. Sorensen_______________
John M. Grenfell (CA Bar No. 88500)
Jacob R. Sorensen (CA Bar No. 209134)
Fusae Nara (pro hac vice)
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7

Counsel for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp
Electronics Corporation

8
9

13

_____/s/ Rachel S. Brass_________________
Rachel S. Brass
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-2933
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

14

Counsel for Defendant Tatung Company of America, Inc.

15

_____/s/ John H. Chung__________________
John H. Chung
WHITE & CASE LLP
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-2787
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

10
11
12

16
17
18
19

Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba
America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America
Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba Mobile Display
Co., Ltd.

20
21
22

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of
23
this document has been obtained from stipulating defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

7

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

Dated: ________________, 2011
8/25

4
_________________________________

5

Susan Illston, United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

8

Case Nos. 3:11-cv-03763-SI; 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI