Interbond Corporation of America v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 20

ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER (11-3763) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
Telephone:
216.621.0200
Facsimile:
216.696.0740
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10

Tracy Cole
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11
Attorneys for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan),
Ltd.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827-SI

19
20

Case No. 3:11-cv-03763-SI

This Document Relates to Individual Case
No. 3:11-cv-03763-SI

MDL No. 1827

21
22

INTERBOND CORPORATION OF
AMERICA
Plaintiff,

23
24

v.

25

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEFENDANT MITSUI & CO.
(TAIWAN), LTD. TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

26

Clerk’s Action Required

Defendants.

27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-03763-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

WHEREAS, plaintiff Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a BrandsMart USA

2

(“BrandsMart”) filed a Complaint in the above-captioned action against defendant Mitsui & Co.

3

(Taiwan), Ltd. (“Mitsui Taiwan”), among other defendants, on June 3, 2011.

4

Whereas, Plaintiffs and Mitsui Taiwan previously entered into a stipulation giving Mitsui

5

Taiwan until October 6, 2011 to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

6

(See Dkt. #12; MDL Dkt. #3366.)

7

WHEREAS, BrandsMart and Mitsui Taiwan have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil

8

Rule L.R. 6-1(a), pursuant to which Mitsui Taiwan shall have an additional extension until

9

December 1, 2011 in which to move against, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, BrandsMart, on the one hand, and

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

11
B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

10

Mitsui Taiwan, on the other hand, that Mitsui Taiwan’s deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or

13

otherwise respond to the Complaint will be December 1, 2011.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Dated: October 4, 2011
By: /s/ Michael E. Mumford_____________
Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.

24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-03763-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2
3
4
5
6

By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno_________________
Philip J. Iovieno
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Interbond Corporation of America

7
8
9

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories
thereto has been obtained.

10

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11

[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4th
Oct., 2011
DATED this ___ day of _____________, _____.

13
14

By: _______________________________________
Hon. SUSAN ILLSTON

15
16
17
18
19

503775686

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-03763-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI