Garvey et al v. Kissmetrics et al
Filing
65
ORDER VACATING ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING AND RESETTING AUGUST 23, 2012 HEARING DATE TO AUGUST 17, 2012 AT 11:00 A.M.: Motion to Dismiss Hearing reset to 8/17/2012 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/9/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
Northern District of California
10
San Francisco Division
IN RE HULU PRIVACY LITIGATION
No. C 11-03764 LB
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
ORDER VACATING ORDER FOR
ADDITIONAL BRIEFING AND
RESETTING AUGUST 23 HEARING
DATE TO AUGUST 17
13
14
15
____________________________________/
The court previously granted Hulu’s request for additional briefing after the Supreme Court’s
16
decision in Edwards. See 6/11/12 Order, ECF No. 64. Given the proceedings before the Supreme
17
Court, further briefing is not necessary. The court previously set the matter specially to
18
accommodate a briefing schedule and a hearing date during the summer. Given that no briefing is
19
needed, the court re-sets the hearing to its normal motions hearing date of Friday, August 17, 2012,
20
at 11 a.m. If that date is inconvenient for the parties because of previously-scheduled vacation or
21
case commitments, the parties may re-set it to any other available motions calendar. Those
22
calendars are generally the first and third Thursdays of each month. (The court can hear the matter
23
as early as July 19, 2012 with at least a week’s advance notice.) At the hearing, the court will hear
24
Hulu’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 9, 2012
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
ORDER (C 11-03764 LB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?