Arredondo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 22

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/8/2011. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13

No. C 11-03767 CRB

MARIA ISABEL ARREDONDO,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Plaintiff,
v.

14

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ET AL,

15

Defendants.

/

16
17

On August 8, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this case. See dkt. 11. Per

18

Northern District Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff’s opposition brief was due on August 22, 2011.

19

Because Plaintiff had not yet filed an opposition brief by that time, the Court on August 31,

20

2011 ordered Plaintiff to show cause why her case should not be dismissed for failure to

21

prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See dkt. 20. Plaintiff failed to file a

22

response to that Order. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: September 8, 2011

26
27
28

G:\CRBALL\2011\03767\order dismissing.wpd

CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

G:\CRBALL\2011\03767\order dismissing.wpd

2