Quirk v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. et al
Filing
35
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 34 SCHEDULE FOR DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRETRIAL DATES. Pretrial Conference set for 3/7/2013; Jury Selection set for 3/25/2013 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 3/25/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/20/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)
*E-Filed 1/20/12*
1 JEFFREY T. MAKOFF (SBN 120004)
jmakoff@vallemakoff.com
2 HEATHER A. LANDIS (SBN 267615)
hlandis@vallemakoff.com
3 MARIO R. NICHOLAS (SBN 273122)
mnicholas@vallemakoff.com
4 VALLE MAKOFF LLP
2 Embarcadero Center, Suite 2370
5 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-8001
6 Facsimile: (415) 986-8003
7 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOE QUIRK
8 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC
CHRISTOPHER G. CALDWELL (SBN 106790)
caldwell@caldwell-leslie.com
9
ANDREW ESBENSHADE (SBN 202301)
esbenshade@caldwell-leslie.com
10
ALBERT GIANG (SBN 224332)
giang@caldwell-leslie.com
11
1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 600
12 Los Angeles, California 90017-2463
Telephone: (213) 629-9040
13 Facsimile: (213) 629-9022
14 Attorneys for Defendants
SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT
15 INC; COLUMBIA PICTURES
INDUSTRIES, INC.; PARIAH;
16 DAVID KOEPP; JOHN KAMPS
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20 JOE QUIRK, an individual,
Case No. CV 11-03773 RS
21
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR
DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRETRIAL DATES
22
Plaintiff,
v.
23 SONY PICTURES
ENTERTAINMENT INC., a Delaware
24 corporation; COLUMBIA PICTURES
INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware
25 corporation; PARIAH, a California
corporation; DAVID KOEPP, an
26 individual; and JOHN KAMPS, an
individual,
27
Defendants.
28
Trial Date:
March 25, 2013
SAC Filed:
November 28, 2011
CV 11-03773 RS
1
Pursuant to the Court’s instructions during the initial case management
2 conference on January 12, 2012 and the Court’s Civil Minute Order dated January
3 12, 2012, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their undersigned counsel,
4 hereby stipulate and agree to the following proposed schedule of discovery and
5 other pre-trial dates based off the currently scheduled trial date of March 25, 2013:
6
FACTUAL DISCOVERY CUT-OFF: September 7, 2012
7
FACTUAL DISCOVERY MOTION FILING DEADLINE: September
8
14, 2012
9
EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND FINAL REPORTS: October 12, 2012
10
REBUTTAL EXPERT DISCLOSURES AND FINAL REPORTS:
11
November 21, 2012
12
EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF: December 21, 2012
13
EXPERT DISCOVERY MOTION FILING DEADLINE: December
14
28, 2012
15
DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING CUT-OFF: January 24, 2013
16
PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE MEETING AND DISCLOSURES:
17
February 14, 2013
18
JOINT PRE-TRIAL STATEMENT AND ORDER: February 25, 2013
19
EXHIBIT EXCHANGE: February 25, 2013
20
MOTIONS IN LIMINE DEADLINE: February 25, 2013
21
OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE DEADLINE: March 4,
22
23
24
2013
FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE: 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, March
7, 2013
25
26
27
28
-1-
CV 11-03773 RS
1
PRE-TRIAL FILINGS (e.g., excerpts of deposition testimony or other
2
discovery to be offered at trial, jury voir dire questions, proposed jury
3
instructions, proposed jury verdict forms, trial briefs): March 18, 2013
4
TRIAL DATE: March 25, 2013
5
6 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED.
7
8
DATED: January 19, 2012
9
10
By /s/ per email authorization
HEATHER A. LANDIS
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOE QUIRK
13
14
15
VALLE MAKOFF LLP
JEFFREY T. MAKOFF
HEATHER A. LANDIS
DATED: January 19, 2012
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC
CHRISTOPHER G. CALDWELL
ANDREW ESBENSHADE
ALBERT GIANG
By
/s/
CHRISTOPHER G. CALDWELL
Attorneys for Defendants
SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT INC;
COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC.;
PARIAH; DAVID KOEPP; JOHN KAMPS
23
24 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
1/20
26 Dated: __________, 2012
27
____________________________________
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
District Court Judge
28
-2-
CV 11-03773 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?