Quirk v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. et al
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 36 TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE PORTIONS OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/24/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2012)
*E-Filed 2/24/12*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
JEFFREY T. MAKOFF (SBN 120004)
HEATHER A. LANDIS (SBN 267615)
MARIO R. NICHOLAS (SBN 273122)
VALLE MAKOFF LLP
2 Embarcadero Center, Suite 2370
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-8001
Facsimile:
(415) 986-8003
Email:
jmakoff@vallemakoff.com
hlandis@vallemakoff.com
mnicholas@vallemakoff.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Joe Quirk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
JOE QUIRK,
Plaintiff,
14
15
vs.
16
SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
et al.,
17
18
19
20
21
22
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:11-CV-03773 RS
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE
PORTIONS OF THE THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT
UNDER SEAL
Trial Date: March 25, 2013
SAC Filed: November 28, 2011
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE
PORTIONS OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL;
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03773 RS
1
Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rules 7-12 and 79-5, and pursuant
2
to the Stipulated Protective Order entered by the Court on December 28, 2011, plaintiff Joe
3
Quirk (“plaintiff”) and defendants Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. (“Sony”), Columbia
4
Pictures Industries, Inc. (“Columbia”), Pariah, David Koepp and John Kamps (collectively,
5
“defendants”) (plaintiff and defendants together, “stipulating parties”), by and through their
6
undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:
7
STIPULATION
8
9
10
11
A.
Third Amended Complaint upon receipt of the final screenplay for PREMIUM RUSH
(“Continuity Script”);
B.
12
13
14
WHEREAS, stipulating parties previously agreed that plaintiff would file a
WHEREAS, on December 23, 2011, stipulating parties filed a stipulated
protective order governing the disclosure of the not-yet-released motion picture,
PREMIUM RUSH (“the Picture”), and the Continuity Script;
C.
15
WHEREAS, on December 28, 2011, the Court approved and entered the
16
stipulated protective order, docket number 30, which made it possible to confidentially and
17
securely screen the Picture and disclose the Continuity Script to plaintiff;
D.
18
WHEREAS, under the terms of the Protective Order, stipulating parties are
19
required to file under seal any documents related to the contents of the Picture or Continuity
20
Script;
21
22
23
E.
WHEREAS, plaintiff intends to file a Third Amended Complaint containing
allegations related to the purported contents of the Picture and/or Continuity Script;
F.
WHEREAS, stipulating parties agree that the following paragraphs, or
24
portions of paragraphs, of the Third Amended Complaint shall be filed under seal:
25
Paragraphs 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 51, 52, 56, 60, 62, 63, 64, 69, 72, 74, 75, 77, 78, 81,
26
82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 92, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 105, 110, 114, 116, 117, 118, 119, 122, 123,
27
124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136 and 137;
28
29
1
30
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE
PORTIONS OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL;
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03773 RS
31
32
1
G.
WHEREAS, stipulating parties agree that sections of the following lines shall
2
be filed under seal: p. 40, lines 1, 13 and 22; page 41, line 5; p. 45, line 15; p. 47, line 8; and
3
p. 50, lines 6, 11 and 18;
4
5
H.
a copy of the Third Amended Complaint that highlights the sections to be redacted; and
6
7
8
I.
and Picture.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
10
1.
11
13
Plaintiff and defendants agree that portions of plaintiff’s Third Amended
Complaint shall be filed under seal pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order entered by
the Court on December 28, 2011;
2.
14
15
WHEREAS, stipulating parties certify that the redactions do not include any
material except that which discloses confidential material related to the Continuity Script
9
12
WHEREAS, plaintiff will lodge with the Court a sealed envelope containing
Plaintiff and defendants agree that the sections of plaintiff’s Third Amended
Complaint set forth in Paragraphs F and G above, shall be filed under seal; and
3.
16
Plaintiff and defendants certify that only sections of the Third Amended
17
Complaint that disclose confidential material related to the Continuity Script and Picture
18
have been redacted and are to be filed under seal.
19
//
20
//
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
28
//
2
29
30
31
32
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE
PORTIONS OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL;
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03773 RS
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3
Dated: February 23, 2012.
VALLE MAKOFF LLP
4
By:
5
6
/s/ Heather Landis
Heather A. Landis
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
8
Dated: February 23, 2012.
CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC
9
By:
10
11
/s/ Albert Giang
Albert Giang
Attorneys for Defendants
12
13
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
24
Dated: February ____, 2012
____________________________________
16
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
17
District Court Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
29
30
31
32
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE
PORTIONS OF THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL;
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03773 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?