Quirk v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. et al
Filing
83
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD DEFENDANT KOEPPS LOAN-OUT COMPANY AS A DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/28/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
JEFFREY T. MAKOFF (SBN 120004)
HEATHER A. LANDIS (SBN 267615)
MARIO R. NICHOLAS (SBN 273122)
VALLE MAKOFF LLP
2 Embarcadero Center, Suite 2370
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-8001
Facsimile:
(415) 986-8003
Email:
jmakoff@vallemakoff.com
hlandis@vallemakoff.com
mnicholas@vallemakoff.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Joe Quirk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT )
INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JOE QUIRK,
Case No. 3:11-CV-03773 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO
FILE A FIFTH AMENDED
COMPLAINT TO ADD DEFENDANT
KOEPP’S “LOAN-OUT COMPANY”
AS A DEFENDANT
[L.R. 6-1(b)]
Trial Date: March 25, 2013
Fourth Amended Complaint Filed: 8/2/12
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE A
FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD DEFENDANT KOEPP’S “LOAN-OUT
COMPANY” AS A DEFENDANT [L.R. 6-1(b)]; CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03773 RS
1
Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1(b), plaintiff Joe Quirk
2
(“plaintiff”) and defendants Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. (“Sony”), Columbia Pictures
3
Industries, Inc. (“Columbia”), Pariah, David Koepp and John Kamps (collectively,
4
“defendants”) (plaintiff and defendants together, “stipulating parties”), by and through their
5
undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:
6
7
8
9
10
11
STIPULATION
A.
WHEREAS, plaintiff intends to file a Fifth Amended Complaint to add
defendant, DGK, Inc., defendant Koepp’s “loan-out company,” to all claims for relief in the
above-entitled action based upon information obtained in discovery;
B.
WHEREAS, while defendants deny that there is any basis for any of the
12
claims against any defendants, including the loan-out company, defendants have agreed to
13
permit plaintiff to file his Fifth Amended Complaint and to add DGK, Inc. as a defendant to
14
all claims for relief alleged in the Complaint, on the terms and conditions described below;
15
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
16
1.
17
18
Plaintiff may file his Fifth Amended Complaint to add defendant DGK, Inc.
as a defendant to all claims for relief alleged in the Complaint;
2.
Discovery shall not reopen, and no new additional discovery shall be taken,
19
other than the newly added party making disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
20
26, and any expert discovery that is timely as of the date of the filing of the Fifth Amended
21
Complaint;
22
3.
The filing of the Fifth Amended Complaint shall not affect the pending
23
motion for summary judgment filed by defendants, or any future motion for summary
24
judgment that may be filed (any order on the pending or any future motion for summary
25
judgment relating to defendant Koepp shall also apply to DGK, Inc.); and
26
27
4.
Defendants’ counsel of record has agreed to accept service of the Fifth
Amended Complaint on behalf of defendant DGK, Inc. by electronic mail; and
28
29
30
31
32
33
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE A
FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD DEFENDANT KOEPP’S “LOAN-OUT
COMPANY” AS A DEFENDANT [L.R. 6-1(b)]; CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03773 RS
1
2
3
5.
No deadlines in this case shall be affected by the filing of the Fifth Amended
Complaint.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
5
Dated: November 28, 2012.
6
VALLE MAKOFF LLP
By: /s/ Heather A. Landis
Heather A. Landis
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Joe Quirk
7
8
9
10
11
Dated: November 28, 2012.
12
CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC
By: /s/ Andrew Esbenshade
Andrew Esbenshade
Attorneys for Defendants
Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.; Columbia
Pictures Industries, Inc.; Pariah; David Koepp;
and John Kamps
13
14
15
16
17
18
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
Dated: __________, 2012
11/28
____________________________________
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
District Court Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO FILE A
FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD DEFENDANT KOEPP’S “LOAN-OUT
COMPANY” AS A DEFENDANT [L.R. 6-1(b)]; CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03773 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?