Beard et al v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Filing
69
ORDER re 68 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Clerks Notice filed by AT&T Services, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company. Case Management Statement due by 9/21/2012. Case Management Conference reset for 9/28/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/1/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
ANDRE BEARD and GLORIBEL
GUERRERO, On Behalf Of Themselves
And All Others Similarly Situated,
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiffs,
Case No. CV 11 3780 CRB
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE SET FOR AUGUST 31,
2012
v.
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE
COMPANY, a California Corporation,
d/b/a AT&T California; and DOES 1-20,
inclusive,
Original Complaint Filed:
Aug. 1, 2011
First Amended Complaint Filed: Dec. 23, 2011
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; CASE NO. CV 11 3780 CRB
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Error! Unknown document property name.
1
2
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING as set forth in the accompanying stipulation, it is hereby
3
ORDERED that the Case Management Conference originally set for August 31, 2012 is
4
continued to September 28, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco and the
5
Case Management Statement is due by September 21, 2012.
DATED: August 1, 2012
8
S
RT
U
O
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
United States District Judge
10
11
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
12
J
15
A
H
ER
LI
RT
14
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
NO
13
R NIA
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FO
6
N
16
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
- 1-
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Error! Unknown document property name.
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; CASE NO. CV 11 3780 CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?