Mendia v. Jackson et al

Filing 25

ORDER RE FUTURE FILINGS by Judge Charles R. Breyer.(crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 No. C 11-03785 CRB BERNARDO MENDIA, ORDER RE FUTURE FILINGS Plaintiff, v. JACKSON ET AL, 15 Defendant. / 16 17 When Plaintiff Bernardo Mendia failed to timely oppose Defendants’ Motion to 18 Dismiss, and failed to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause (dkt. 15), the Court 19 dismissed his case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), see Order (dkt. 20). 20 Plaintiff also failed to respond to Defendants’ Motion for a Pre-Filing Review Order and to 21 Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant (dkt. 12), and did not appear at the hearing the Court 22 held on that same motion, see Minutes (dkt. 24). 23 The Court hereby finds the vexatious litigant Motion MOOT in light of the dismissal 24 of this case. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file all future pleadings as a prisoner so long as he is 25 in custody. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: January 18, 2012 G:\CRBALL\2011\3785\order re future filings.wpd CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?