Mendia v. Jackson et al

Filing 25

ORDER RE FUTURE FILINGS by Judge Charles R. Breyer.(crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14

No. C 11-03785 CRB

BERNARDO MENDIA,

ORDER RE FUTURE FILINGS

Plaintiff,
v.
JACKSON ET AL,

15

Defendant.

/

16
17

When Plaintiff Bernardo Mendia failed to timely oppose Defendants’ Motion to

18

Dismiss, and failed to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause (dkt. 15), the Court

19

dismissed his case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), see Order (dkt. 20).

20

Plaintiff also failed to respond to Defendants’ Motion for a Pre-Filing Review Order and to

21

Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant (dkt. 12), and did not appear at the hearing the Court

22

held on that same motion, see Minutes (dkt. 24).

23

The Court hereby finds the vexatious litigant Motion MOOT in light of the dismissal

24

of this case. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file all future pleadings as a prisoner so long as he is

25

in custody.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: January 18, 2012

G:\CRBALL\2011\3785\order re future filings.wpd

CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE